Modesty would certainly go a long way with these folks, and truly “hot people” know this, but they’re probably narcissists, so yes...run away, indeed!
Modesty would certainly go a long way with these folks, and truly “hot people” know this, but they’re probably narcissists, so yes...run away, indeed!
Wrong! Late 30's and 40's is prime hotness. Confidence exudes.
None of these people have accurate concepts of how attractive they actually are. I know that I am super fucking critical about what I consider to be beautiful, but honestly, they are lying to themselves. And yep the PR chick is average. It’s okay not to be hot, but thinking you’re far better looking than you actually…
Because that’s where you discuss fun guys?
Exactly. Even if you could have anyone, you wouldn’t want everyone. And super fucking exhausting. No one wants to be fucking leered at even when they’re running to the drug store at 10 pm for tampons, no one likes attention that much.
Useful for so many situations; so descriptive just with its gestures.
SUCH a good gif.
Maybe you’re hot and smart? That combination will not stand.
dating in New York as a 30-something executive in private equity
Also, Hot Woman, thank you for this!
Omg that is weird.
The ESPN documentary about OJ did a great job of showing how charming he could be, and how that could turn on a dime. I know at least one of his friends discussed how he went from believing OJ was innocent to being positive he was guilty.
I grew up in a very small town in a very conservative area, and a friend from high school still lives there. He announced a year or so ago that he was transitioning from female to male and I was pleasantly surprised by the community’s support, as I’m not aware of anyone else out as trans in the area. I was talking…
He defended OJ because OJ was his friend. He also dropped OJ as a friend after the trial and by all accounts was a fairly good guy.
He wasn’t smiling. I’ve never seen those pictures. Post if they exist.
I think assuming Kardashian knew he was guilty is too presumptive. His best friend was being accused of something horrendous, its understandable that 1) he’d want to believe his friend didn’t do it; and also 2) he agreed to defend him before he knew the extent of the evidence against OJ (see: People v. OJ, OJ Made in…
Keep saying this. I have met many many more criminal defense attorneys who are principled in performing their job (providing defense to criminal defendants per the Constitution) than I have met prosecutors who are principled in doing theirs (seeking justice instead of trying to “win” a case).
Oh, that’s interesting. I didn’t know that. I still think it’s fine if he defended him knowing that he was guilty.
Kardashian/Jenner clan is great at revising history. The problem is they don’t realize we remember the shit they said before so it’s easy to catch them in lies. For years, Kris Jenner said she didn’t see any evidence of abuse. Now she says she tried to help her friend escape domestic violence. These people are…
Speaking of narcissistic, egocentric assholes, she really believes Kardashian defended Simpson as a way of getting back at his ex-wife? I think I’ll stick with the version where he believed his close friend couldn’t have done such a heinous thing until he was faced with enough proof to change his mind about it.