momofpeanut
momofpeanut
momofpeanut

I was there, too! Mom, sister, aunt, cousin and I all marched. Hey hey, ho ho, George Bush has got to go!

Why are my tax dollars used for expanding a brand and marketing rather than providing medical services? This is unconscionable. Except, of course, if it’s the military, because God knows no one ever enlisted in the military before until they brought giant flags to the NFL, had a color guard at the NBA, and sponsored

Yeah, those lazy assholes with cystic fibrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, or battling cancer - shut up and work!

I think you’re trying to apply a standard of reasonableness that may not exist in a court of law. Batty Scheck, one of the world’s foremost experts on DNA evidence, posed a line of question8ng in the Simpson trial that flat out theorized that someone else’s blood on the gate deteriorated into Simpson’s DNA profile, a

I think you are making a huge unsupported leap in logic from a government attorney not rebutting a claim to implying that means the claim is factual. Having several lawyers in the family, here’s some reasons that were quickly spitballed by them as to why it wouldn’t be rebutted:

According to the article, he got the diversity visa in 2011, which means the original comment stands.

Ya know, Tits Be Crazy.

Thanks for the apology - i apologize as well. I usually try to take it as passionate people passionately defending their point.

I am puzzled why you don’t use your quoting on my original comment, where I said, “...or allows them decide that they don’t agree with the system so they won’t testify.” (I missed a word originally sorry.)

You must have missed the part where she has repeatedly said she has already testified to everything she knows.  What words would you use to describe that statement?  

Look, there’s a lot wrong with the American justice system, but no justice system in the world lets witnesses decide whether their testimony is relevant or not, or allows them decide that they don’t agree with the system so they won’t testify.

It’s not about morals. He committed a misdemeanor by engaging in sexual acts for money. Mr. Kraft could use his money, power, and position to either fight to legalize sex work, or fly to Nevada, a state where it is legal in certain areas, and engage it in there. Like a preschooler, he knew the rules, chose to break

Thank you! I have an acquaintance whose 15 year old son was a victim of a married teacher. The boy thought it was love, and when he found out he was one of several spread among several schools where she subbed, and found out because the police told him, he was devastated. Add in the subsequent trial, the teasing he

This makes me so sad. I started my daughter on the pill at 16 (with her consent after discussion). She hadn’t kissed anyone yet.  I didn’t put her behind the wheel of a car without insurance; and I didn’t think buying insurance meant she would drive recklessly, smash into strange cars, or bring home a rental.  I

God bless him. I am waiting for the other shoe to drop, as apparently victimizing people of color is now ‘emotionally damaging.”

+1 TV Judgeship

You are correct.  Ned was to admit his guilt and be sentenced to the Wall, in both the book and the show.

Only one of the four allegations occurred while he was working on Cosmos.

He didn’t take her into his office - he invited her to his apartment to unwind and share some wine. She felt obligated to go because he was her boss. Based on her reports, he was hinting to see if she would bite on an affair. She left.