mollyseagrim
mollyseagrim
mollyseagrim

What he means by that is that we shouldn't care about these women. These guys never really mean "please care about these guys too, just as I care about your girls!" What they mean is "I don't give a shit about these girls, I don't really give a shit about these guys either, but I will pour all my efforts in derailing

"For the sake of their privacy, we've blurred out the names,"

The part that doesn't make sense is Solange using Jays name. Her sister is Beyonce...

That argument works only if the pharmaceutical industry operated in a vacuum.

I am 8 months pregnant and have had a very healthy and normal pregnancy with very few issues, however, here are a few of the "inconveniences" I have experienced so far:

Carry on, my wayward nuns. There'll be peace when you are done.

I cannot believe they were surprised the people were terrified. I think this is exactly what they wanted. Makes them feel powerful.

Gotta protect the man's right to join a lesbian dating application so he can creep on women there. Yeah. You're fighting the good fight.

I think you're wrong though. I think they certainly can. A conference is one thing, but a space reserved specifically for sexual and romantic interests? Come the fuck on, we've been doing it forever perfectly legally. There are shit tons of ways to get around gender discrimination in pubic spaces in Canada - one is to

Um. No.

That's a what about the men comment, though. Because we all know that. It's understood, part of the subtext. Every single time an article mentions men someone shows up to say this, but it isn't necessary. Of course, it isn't all men!

I think it's apropos now to mention that I actually used to serve at a bar-restaurant alongside a waitress who is literally, right now, a professional physicist splitting atoms. She, like so many physicists before her, had to GO TO SCHOOL.

If people serving food are so brilliant why aren't they splitting atoms or something?

You're one of those customers, aren't you?

"Vindictive and mean spirited?" To factually recall an experience they had where they don't use the names of anyone involved? It's completely harmless.

That's just shifting the blame. No one has an obligation to like you, and if a woman isn't interested in you, it's not necessarily because she's shallow or "entitled to the studly men." I'm a fat, depressed man who writes openly about being fat and depressed and I do just fine. You're the one that sounds entitled.

If Princeton has officially snubbed her, can we stop referring to her as "Princeton Mom"? How about "The Woman Formerly Known as Prince-ton Mom"?

I'm for collectively liking something. But the poster holder's shitty messages really are not it.

Mindstyle, I haven't looked at the articles yet, but honestly the idea that "HUGE corporations and their friends in congress" want to fight with scientists over vaccinations is distressing to me. Do you think that because you believe these corporations make money off of vaccines? Because believe me, they do not. In