We come to this streamer, because we’re bored. We come to Netflix to scroll, to ignore, to get background noise. Because we need that, all of us. That indescribable feeling we get when we “Skip Intro,” and we go somewhere we’ve been 472,000 times before, like another binge through “Kimmy Schmidt.”

*gently, like Danny Tanner giving fatherly advice on Full House* Tim... *begin “lesson” music* you also comment on articles about YouTube videos on the internet. *warm smile* So it’s likely at least one of those is a lie. But that’s ok! We’re all losers here. Now, here *hands them a Mountain Dew Code Red*, wipe your…

Danvers was being an unreliable narrator with Pete about the abusive husband case she and Navarro worked on. As we saw in the flashback, he killed his wife, but he was alive when they got there. I’m guessing Danvers or Navarro shot him in cold blood (pun intended). This is part of their complicated dynamic, a bond…

Trying to kill Hamas members because they are trying to kill Jews is not genocide.

Im not in your class professor shitstain. Go ramble about 145 CE on your fucking broke ass Substack or something.

Wow you're really just gagging for any excuse to support a genocide huh 

I feel you, but (and this is an honest question), what would have been an analogous comment?

“because Western media only shows the other side...Why they do that, I will let you deduce for yourself”

Whatever the distinction is that you’re trying to make, you’re not making it clearly. What is the difference between “being outraged” about what you call “an atrocity that is indefensible” and “taking sharp political sides” (as opposed to . . . appropriately dull ones?) about “the conflict”? And what is it…

Or, alternately, they aren’t buying into excuses like “well, Hamas is making us kill all those civilians,” which is an absolute nonsense argument.

The heat in the tent on warm/hot days has been a problem for years.

I think directors who release 3.5 hour movies to theaters should list out the exact scenes that are best to take a break during. “This is where I phoned it in,” said Scorsese, who probably hasn’t gone more than an hour between pee breaks for the past three decades.

Midnight Mass is best for me. Not subtle at all by the end. Some full on gore. But I thought it was one of the best Stephen King adapatations (not actually written by Stephen King).

I definitely didn’t watch the trial. Because I’m not an absolute ghoul.

Hence the reason she was discussing it with her therapist, who, hopefully told her that that was nuts (in the most medically polite way possible).

It’s possible to make Poirot consistently interesting, as the Suchet adaptations demonstrated. In fact, he was so perfect in the role I’m not sure why anyone else bothers.

The trouble with adapting Roger Ackroyd is the final twist, as written, can’t possibly work in a visual medium.

Or The Murder of Roger Aykroyd. That would be a great one for the screen, if you could nail the casting of of Dr. Sheppard.

And we’re supposed to assume now that they were together for almost 20 years and Carrie was just not as happy as she was with the guy she dated for less than 2 years.

@avclub-9079ea527e08a24dfad44e3302d5f091:disqus "Now I'm going to jerk off to pictures of Danny DeVito; I may not find him attractive or arousing, but because everyone is beautiful in their own way, I feel obligated to empower him."