modern-millie
modern_millie
modern-millie

I'd just as soon walk on my own lips than delight in someone else's misfortune, however, regarding the Biebs...

I like to imagine Bieber getting some 'Scared Straight' realness from his fellow inmates while in jail. "You wanna end up like this?"

My hatred is informed. No team in the NFL has consistently "chippier" games, I abhor Pete Carroll, their record would be incredibly different if there were more frequent PED tests during the year, and the bandwagon fanbase that stole Texas A&M's gimmick sets my teeth on edge.

Ugh, this is putting an unacceptable dent in my mountain of hatred for the Seahawks.

My orgasms go to 11.

It's worse than I ever could have imagined.

You're not. Her show is bad, she's grating and it's worse now that she is everywhere promoting her whirlwind romance.

Why is Kaley Cuoco a thing? Please stop putting her in dirtbags.

Holy fucking YAWN.

i would predict unhealthy guys are far less likely to go to the doctor...no visit...no shame

I feel like no matter how old I get, a part of me will always be the chubby kid sitting miserably on the exam table, watching in humiliation as the doctor pulled out the height/weight percentile chart to walk my mother through exactly how fat I was compared to all the other kids.

Fucking Sallie Mae....my payments are so high, I can't make them. When I questioned it 4 years ago, they told me they were looking at "combined household income for you and *Dude*". Dude & I divorced back in 06, so what they're doing is looking at my income, Mr.RangerKotka's income, former husband's income....AND HIS

There isn't one. It was nice of Citi and Discover to forgive the loans, but they didn't really have an obligation to.

I don't understand the problem with Sallie Mae? Mother was a cosigner. She was liable for the balance even if kid died/defaulted on his side of the agreement. Not nice but I thought that was the whole point of cosigners, two people are liable for debts.

Every one needs to calm down with the old man thing. If you worked in a restaurant, ever, you would get why it's bad to let people loiter.

Discussions about topics like eating and health around here tend to very quickly devolve into the argument that "some" or "many" or "significant numbers" of people have no choice in their lifestyles because of food deserts, poverty, working three jobs, lack of a vehicle to get to a store and an neighbourhood too

Like how Starbucks fulfills the "Providing de facto NYC Public Bathrooms" duty.

But Starbucks isn't putting people out, are they?

McDonald's is shitty in ways that both stretch and outstretch the imagination, but are you really arguing that restaurants don't have the right to kick out people not buying food and lingering for an unreasonable amount of time? Just as a general principle?

So no one likes them, but judging by sales, almost everyone eats there anyway.