Thanks, that did spare me the trouble of typing. The wikipedia page was, indeed, helpful. It never occurred to me that an "eating club" was a Thing. I mean, apparently, it's only a thing at Princeton.

What on earth is an eating club?

I understand.

Yes, so that takes a bit more of the pie.

That is the solution.

But it's not a Walmart skirt. Its price is not purely materials and labor- you're paying for the brand, too. It's the same reason a Coach bag is more expensive than a similar, but generic bag or Starbucks coffee costs more than McDonald's coffee. People are willing to pay more for the name or the image of the brand.

Yeah, but material cost takes up the majority of a garment's cost, but what I'm driving at is that there is no direct relationship between this skirt costing $50 and not "covering your ass." It sells for $50 because that's what the company priced it at. It's supposed to be short, that's the design. The original…

I'm not sure how price equates to the length of the skirt.

Judging by how much time she had to film this, she had plenty of time to let the guy pass.

She's the only one in the car. The passenger seat is empty.

Because you can't film things well if you're not looking at the subject, and that would be a really awkward pose. Either way, looking forward or behind, it's totally unsafe.

I am not bothered by this, sorry.

They're all Gawker sites, wtf is the big deal? Why so possessive?

So this woman is driving 60 mph in the fast lane, turning around with her cell phone to film a guy tailgating her. Who's the idiot? She should have just moved into the right lane and let him pass, even though he was indisputably being an asshole.

This pose screams "hiding your imperfections well". I know it's designed to minimized her midsection. It's a beautiful photo, though.

Shit, I would send you some.

Perfection.

HOW ARE YOU STILL ALIVE EVEN??!?!?!

Ambien should have been in this bracket.

I did. It just wasn't as awesome as the bowl I'm smoking tonight.