Cool Walker Texas Ranger. Getting within slashing range of a knife is your prerogative, but the rest of us will pass.
Cool Walker Texas Ranger. Getting within slashing range of a knife is your prerogative, but the rest of us will pass.
Not really. The more crazy, violent people are gone, the less innocent, non-violent people are injured.
Looks like a clean shot to me. If a dude is charging you with a deadly weapon, you are free to put him down. It sucks that he was clearly crazy, but since crazy doesn't physically hamper you, you have to treat them the same as non-crazy violent people.
Yeah, shutting down conversations about race seem like the best plan of action. Its worked up until now, right?
In the case of magazines, yes. This isn't a government service. There is no human right to celebrity gossip magazines.
So what is the breakdown? Should it match the demographics of the world? The demographics of the US? The demographics of the English reading US? Or the demographics of the readership of people? I posit that it should match the readership of people and be tweaked as readership grows or slackens.
That is why I started with the issue of employment discrimination being bad, but giving zero shits about discriminating in content of the magazine, because you are free to run a magazine's content however you want.
They can't discriminate in employment, but certainly in content. Media goes with what sells. If that isn't multiple covers of Earth, Wind, and Fire, so be it.
I agree that employment discrimination is horrible, but magazine content is anyone's choice regardless of whether or not it is horrible. If you think People magazine is what is holding you back, I weep for your future.
I don't really care about a hostile work environment. Slut is certainly inappropriate, but not inherently racist, as was claimed. You clearly don't know what subjective means (basically an opinion). For instance you might find something slutty, I might not. It is all subject to our personal interpretation.
That is like saying Ebony should make more articles about white people to increase their readership. Magazines are niche markets.
Don't the have demographic specific People magazines? I used to read People en Espanol in high school to keep up with my Spanish. It wasn't just a translated version, but specifically catered to Hispanic people
Slut is super subjective and it would be hard to prove it was racist if she used language like that to describe non-black people as well.
Actually, they only have a responsibility to meet all the federal standards for non-discrimination. The content of there magazine can be as whitewashed or horrible or racists or sexist or bigoted as they would like it to be. It's their magazine.
Word, I had a chiropractor once who kept touching my back and shoulders. It was really unprofessional.
I think her proposed legislation would allow you to file a claim forever. I think you only have 5 years to file a claim now and once it's filed, the clock stops.
I think they mean, they are getting rid of zero tolerance for non-violent acts and may be keeping it for violent ones.
It's just the "implication" -Dennis Reynolds.
A more fitting tribute would have been to allow the Brown's to win.
Agreed, if you get that stuff out of the way in the 20's you won't have a freak out when you are 40 and think, shit, I still look good, but now I have an income. Maybe I should go on a tear. Instead you have already worked through your tear.