But the question that the judge had to answer is whether her career was irreparably damaged. Unfortunately, in this case, it can be argued that her prior success hurt her in the end.

She’s in the music industry, which is notoriously fickle. Yet she’s had more success in it than 99.999999% of all people who are in the…

Except that this case has literally nothing to do with the “rights of corporations.” The same result should have happened if this was a contract between two individuals.

As I understand this, it was a ruling against her request for a preliminary injunction to record music outside of Dr. Luke/Sony. The judge quite rightly denied that request. The judge also quite rightly denied Dr. Luke’s request to throw out the sexual assault claims. She can still win after she submits proof of her…

Let’s not make this anything more than it is. This was a contract case. The law has always respected contracts, and for a good reason. Kesha was asking for the court to allow her to breach. But she was asking based on a claim that hasn’t been proven and it disputed by the other side. Should it be so easy to breech a…