And the divorce rate backs you up.

That's about the extent of dialogue you can expect from them.

Yes. There's a difference between what Webster says a word means and what that word means in common usage.

Maybe reframe how you approach your exercise?

whoop whoop

Dude, the only strangers you should be talking to in public are other dudes. Anything else is problematic.

Thank you for this.

LOL. Yes. Gamers are a "catered to majority."

Exactly.

The one that argues with Jezebel.

Dude, don't waste your breath. There's no dialogue with Jezebels. Unless you agree with the mob, you're a troll, nice guy, or MRA. And certainly mansplaining.

True enough, but we don't flip out when someone makes a joke about it then either. Someone makes a joke about 'crazy chicks', we don't immediately take to the internet and rage about it.

Dude culture.

Non-violence is great as a personal choice.

Gotta disagree. In most violent confrontations, the person who throws the first punch wins. Real fights aren't like on T.V. One or two hits connect and you're down and that's it. In a situation where you feel threatened, if you wait for the other person to get physical first, odds are you're gonna lose. When your…

Yes. "Renegades of Funk" makes me want to hit the radio with a shovel too. All this time I thought I was alone.

Well, if the articles started getting it right, pretty soon no one would read them because no one would have to.

Yeah they do. And I don't get why the article had to tie it to Feminism either.

He has a fair point. Most sex articles men come across are about making men better in bed. It's all about "finding her g spot" and "giving her great orgasms." For guys reading Mens Health, the focus is very much on the female sexual experience.

Let me just save you some time here in the comments. It's gonna be a whole lotta "nobody cares about your boner." - which is kinda funny given what the article's about. Let them rave. We'd probably object just as much to the tips in Cosmo.