Well, it’s good for Dennis Allen’s estate.

Get down, get down!

Well, can’t put it in SF*, because we already have the T. Denny Sanford center and the old Arena, and everybody’s already pissed off that the mayor wants to use extra taxes to build another city-use building.

Are you kidding me? Pao has always had a 2 inch vertical. Bynum couldn’t jump, either. It’s why his lob passes in L.A. went to Shannon Brown.

Psh. I’ve been not getting any since before it was cool.

I can’t believe that there isn’t a “In Mother Russia...” joke, yet.

+один

I agree that autonomous vehicles is a technology that will become commonplace sooner rather than later. However, 5-10 years seems somewhat optimistic to me, especially when you consider that few, if any, fleet owners are currently looking for fully autonomous vehicles. The focus, for now, anyway, is on semi-autonomy,…

I believe it. I suppose in these situations, the driver will remember to hook up when they run out of juice.

Damn, man. +1

Yup. I worked at a log-auditing company, and the rules were confounding as heck. I was just thinking about how drivers, even with autonomous vehicles and e-logs would still figure out ways to break the rules.

The good news is that autonomous vehicles is a separate technology from battery-operated vehicles. Vehicle autonomy for the heavy-duty sector is probably achievable in our lifetimes. Battery-operated or emissionless technology is probably not.

Oops, and then I re-read your comment. What you’ve described is a straight-truck or van.

Came here to say basically the same thing, except that what it should be is just another cable to hook/unhook between the tractor and trailer, since electrical/signal connections are already made between tractor and trailer. A driver shouldn’t have to physically move batteries between the two.

It should be. In the meantime, your state officials seem determined to waste your tax money to keep that from happening.

“An incident?” Of what, someone using the “wrong” bathroom? You’ve admitted to as much, yourself. The law doesn’t care what you intended to do in there, it just cares that you are a man that uses the women’s bathroom.

It’s also evidence that the law fails in it’s claimed intent to keep perverts out of bathrooms, and that it is only useful as a tool for discrimination. Good on you for making this plainly evident. Hopefully, your lawmakers and governor will also realize that it isn’t worth wasting your tax money in defense of such a…

A shotgun with full choke?

I hear ya. Maybe, if they’re lucky, they might manage to make the four seed in the softest region.

I like the way you think, but I think the foul should be counted in any case.