It’s gonna be a snake-pit, and by all reports that is just how Trump likes it. He apparently delights in pinning his underlings against one-another while doing absolutely none of the heavy lifting (or even light reading) himself.

The NYU site is a great resource. For this particular question, I’d recommend her 1919 article A Parents’ Problem or Woman’s? Sanger is pretty clear, and radical, for 1919.

So much this. Nikolai Tesla never shut up about it, and said eugenics would be the law of the land in every developed nation by the year 2100. Alexander Graham Bell tried to outlaw sign-language to keep the deaf from marrying one-another and reproducing. SCOTUS, including former Prez William H Taft, decided states had…

Because they don’t feel untouchable. Every time they have to pay taxes, or, god forbid, treat two men as a married couple, or are asked not to be cruel and demenaing in thier word choice just because they have the power to be (ie, political correctness), they feel they are being coerced, and bullied.

Next she’ll tell me a firefighter is 20 times more likely to suffer from smoke inhalation than a black man.

She doesn’t think it was sexist. She thinks she doesn’t want to talk about what she said, and that she can make the media talk about sexism instead, and then make everyone else talk about the people talking about sexism.

Oh gosh please don’t use “I heard it multple times on NPR...” That’s a terrible, terrible way to communicate with people. Even in a venue where people agree with you! That is not substantially different than saying “I saw in Facebook.” or “Everyone at work is talking about.” I love NPR, but NPR is not a source in and…

Absolutely. I’m all for more verification of the computerised voting system. If this leads to that, great! But Clinton wasn’t talking out of her ass when she said the outcome must be respected. People like to think she’s so damn callous and calculated, her choices reflect some really clear principals and beliefs,…

You know what, I feel like this whole thing has exposed that most people just don’t give a flying fuck. There will be some nutters, there will be some protests, but I don’t expect much more.

Do you have a link for the NSA claiming absolute proof? They know absolutely that Russia was behind the DNC hacks, but I’ve seen no confirmation from the NSA of election day tampering. All I’ve got in a rather old claim from September, that there were hacking attempts into state voter registration databases in Arizona…

That’s disingenuous. NSA director Adm. Michael Rogers made those comments in response to a question about WikiLeaks’ releasing hacked DNC emails. That quote has nothing to do with the voting software or election day hacking.

There are two things you can do with a tiara.

I know these are meant to be snide.

In fact, she didn’t threaten or demean as “bimbos” any of Trump’s alleged victims, so, point Melania.

No. No point Melanie.

Doesn’t matter what he looks like. He’s wealthy, famous and male. Duh.

It’s so true. I never thought any president could be in more danger from a murder-crazed loon than Obama was as the first African American in the office, but it seems like the irrational rage against Hilary is actually louder and more violent.

1000% better than “Fundamentally Broken, Physically Repulsive, and Repugnantly Evil” is still just “Fundamentally Broken and Repugnantly Evil.”

I think nothing. Sept 1st was the very last day to change ballots at all. Voting has started now. Pence can drop out, but good chance that everyone would still see his name on the ballot.

I always figured she was fighting against the slippery slope and absurd double standard of it all, not the actual content.