Lots of innocent people plead guilty to avoid the risk of conviction and lengthy incarceration.

You can’t have a pre-nup after you’re married.

I don’t see how a contract requiring marriage could be legally enforceable.

Part of “finding a solution” would be convincing fickle actors to do things they don’t want to do, like any manager has to sometimes.

That employer still would have built their facility somewhere if the corruption where clamped down on.

Hypocritical bullshit. There is a fundamental right to confront one’s accusers. There isn’t any right to commit defamation.

We’re literally talking about a document doxxing completely random people with entirely unfounded accusations. You’re the worst sort of hypocrite.

She did curate it, though. She highlighted completely unfounded accusations of rape.

It looks like that only applies if the subject is a public figure and the defendant cannot have “acted in reckless disregard of its truth or falsity.” The former is going to be pretty hard to argue, but maybe, but the latter is open and shut. She made no attempt whatsoever to confirm these accusations.

The claim has to be false on the balance of probabilities. As there’s no evidence for them, that threshold has already been cleared.

The people on her list have a right to confront her for her accusations to clear their names.

Yes she did. Even if it where only to one person, but of course she published it much more widely than that.

There’s no evidence for the claims in that spreadsheet. No court would hold them to be truthful.

You’re a bit confused there. Are you trying to say you can’t privately libel or slander someone? You’re flat out wrong on that; the obvious example would be giving a harmful employment reference.

I notice you yet again ignored the question: what if it were you on that list? You’re just as guilty as they.

You have absolutely no reason to believe any of that just because someone anonymously added them to a list.

So you wouldn’t want to be able to sue her if you got fired for being on the list?

That’s a difference in degree, not kind.

You don’t see something wrong with someone getting fired/not getting hired because a jilted ex put them on a list?

For that to happen she has to have published it to at least one person willingly.