Are you denying in full the freedom of association of the driver? That's absurd...

The people working for Uber are computer programmers, not drivers. 

No. They are independent contractors paying a fee for access to a platform. If Joe's Plumbing pays Angie's List or Home Advisor to gain access to the potential customer base afforded by an electronic platform built and maintained by a third party, do they become employees of Angie's List or Home Advisor?

That may be true.... however, the choice whether or not to use that particular platform for any reason resides solely with the contractor. 

Both McDonald's and Burger King would demand minimum hours, compulsory attendance, and other customary obligations from an employee/employer relationship. Absolutely none of which exist in the gig economy ride share industry..... Because it's not an employee/employer relationship.

Except that the McDonald's brothers did serve burgers. Many of them. Long before offering franchisees to sell licensed product under licensed branding. Uber has never been anything other than code.

Uber has never driven a single person around. 

The code and the platform existed before the drivers. The code can be easily updated to accommodate a wide variety of location bsed services beyond simple ride sharing.

The drivers don’t create or manage the code. The drivers don’t own or maintain servers.

Legally speaking, Uber is technically correct.

Well, Uber's not wrong....

Investment in technology related items, like self-driving tech.

Something about the front of this reminds me of the Subaru Casa Blanca.

It needs to get that tumor looked at before it gets worse.

TeslAssholes?

There’s an easy solution to solve this. Manufacturers Cup Challenge.

I think the R coupes did, but I think the vert was auto only.

This new notification system is shit.

The real question:

I think his front swaybar links are broken.