Male DNA was found inside her underwear, and it was tested and proven not to belong to any Ramsey family member. That’s some pretty strong evidence that it wasn’t Burke or John.

The male DNA found in her panties did not match any family member. So unless her sexual assault was unrelated to her murder, this seems unlikely.

People wonder (and by people, I mean GOP bitching) why there are high rates of welfare dependence, poverty and criminality. But, if you don’t pay people enough that, on a full time (and even over time) job/s, they can live independently, it ensures people will either rely on welfare or give up entirely.

How is a basic income not ‘support?’ Also, how could single parents live on $20,000, if this included all living expenses, plus health care, day care, etc? Lots of people would still be struggling to meet basic expenses.

I’m trying to get my staff (90% women) a raise for 2017 because currently they make shit and my (white, male) GM is fighting me every step of the way, citing our “bottom line”. Meanwhile, he keeps holding company-wide meetings about how much he cares about the employees’ family and community life and supporting them…

Your starting pay is more than I make after my last raise.

I think a basic income is a great idea, but sexism still exists and needs to be addressed. We can work on both things at the same time.

i told my dad that at my new job my starting pay is $12:48 and that even though the pay is low it has great benefits, he replied “ great benefits, thats just code for not paying you enough to live and have all your needs met. you’re an adult, you should be paid enough to make you’re own decisions about what you do…

This has been known for some time. I imagine that’s why politicians don’t give a shit about raising the minimum wage.

Many of these jobs are labor intensive (waitressing and housekeeping and being an HCA fucks your body UP) and don’t forget we did those blue collar jobs when all the menfolk were off fighting WW2. But then they came home and took them back sending us back to the kitchen, and women who did work could only find work…

Women have physical strength. Blue collar jobs don’t require exceptional strength that is unattainable to women. Being blind to that fact is the same bias that keeps women out of these jobs. If women manage to get hired despite this bias, they still can get driven out of their jobs by sexual harassment. Some men are…

Obviously the woman didn’t try hard enough to be attractive as she got older. Sad!

My god. Yeah and what about the women and children they abandon with no means because their dick wants to go into a younger woman.

It is so fucking shameful that an American woman can work more than full time at a minimum wage job and still be in poverty. We should be better than this.

I recall that when my sister had a baby, her husband made a remark that he was suddenly treated better by his employers (all male, white finance firm)—more responsibilities and status in the office—and chalked it up to because he was a new father. He said this to me with no introspection and didn’t question what…

Plus the ladies don’t appreciate money like menfolk do. Apparently the money appreciating gene is in the Y-chromosome. It’s just science.

Listen, he can marry only so many Scandinavian/Baltic state women.

Don’t get it confused now. His supporters were mostly uneducated white women. If the entire election were up to women as a whole - Hillary would have won.

“As a woman who’s worked for my dad’s company company ever since graduation, I appreciate the struggle women face in workforce, but I think if more women just applied themselves to being born better, this could be avoided.”

In hiring at any level, I assume there is still a lingering sensibility that a job to a man represents the livelihood of his family. Whereas a job to a woman is an unholy compromise resulting from her failure to perform as a woman. Therefore a man’s job deserves more pay, more benefits, and he deserves it more than…