but can’t get past their thoughts of my if they watched it!

A rifle bullet passing slow-mo through the oppositely waving boobs of the girl with the katana to head shot a zombie is the peak of human artistic endeavor and we all know it

I feel like we have some very different definitions of “NSFW”, this is mostly just grade school level sexuality for people who are afraid to just watch things with actual sex...obviously Bible Black being a particularly noteworthy exception lol.

Right? The only reason this movie even got made is to capitalize on the current popularity of the game.

An entire generation who have never heard of Dungeons and Dragons? In 2022? No.  I would greet them with the same disbelief I give the 40 year old Youtube reactors who claim they’ve never listened to Michael Jackson before.  Between Lord of the Rings, A Game of Thrones, and Stranger Things, D&D has always been a part…

Whether what is “necessary, helpful, or a wise use of their time”? The few extra seconds she spent describing herself for the benefit of people who wouldn’t be able to see her? If some blind people don’t need or want that accommodation or see the use in it, fine. But there is a difference between that and Harris…

People engaging in visual self-description provide a brief overview of what they look like and what they are wearing — any details they feel may be important for blind and low-vision participants.

She’s acknowledging someone who isn’t me! This is an outrage!

It’s wrong, but it’s on-brand from the same site that said that using a 1920s animation aesthetic means you need to use it to make a statement about racism, nothing else is acceptable.

Every time a writer here types the word “orientalism” in article they should consider that fact 

They don’t. This is concern trolling at its finest.

I liked when the kitty got a bag stuck on its head. 

I’ll start this by saying that anyone is free to feel insulted by whatever they feel insulted by. But I - an Asian-American living in a third world country - really think this criticism is stretching a bit.

I actually don’t think using a real life aesthetic makes you have “a responsibility to grapple with its history.” I see the rice hat idea is being a bit more questionable, but “they didn’t insert a painful history lesson about a real life community (that had nothing to do with the story of their game)“ is... a plus?

Yet this site name is Kotaku. If there is a sense of irony about “appropriation” being ignored here... *shrugged*

oh man. True gamer vibes. King Shit even

I haven’t failed a game with its premise in the title this fast since Don’t Shit Your Pants.

Its a video game.