missandry2point0
MissAndry
missandry2point0

Well, since she’s the one who’d be getting the abortion, it’s really her personal beliefs that matter in this situation, not yours, isn’t it?

Off topic, but your comment reminded me of the time I walked into my six-year-old sister’s bedroom after she had gotten in trouble to find her straddling the window sill. She said dramatically, “Don’t come any closer or I’ll jump!” I told her to go ahead, since the window was approximately two feet off the ground. Ah,

Um hellloooooo it’s look left, look right, look left again... aren’t children indoctrinated with this anymore?

that’s why I stick to cocaine it’s heart healthy

Oh fuck yourself.

This was beautifully written, as most in the comments are saying. It breaks my heart to see “burn the stores,” though. While I obviously know that making sure no one is hurt and that changes are made are priorities number one, I’m really hoping that no one gets their life’s work burnt down again—most of these

HAHA BRO, YA BURNT!

Here’s a hot take for dudes all over the globe (and laydiezz, but I never have this problem w them)

One time I got arrested for smoking pot on the pier when I was getting ready to see the Flaming Lips at Terminal 5 and I wooed my arresting officer and his comrades w my hilarious jokes so while my friend was hysterically crying handcuffed to a bench I got to eat pizza w my new best friends who magically “lost” the

Reading only this article and none of the pleadings, the College might get the information about the victim’s subsequent sexual partners because this is indeed relevant to whether or to what degree her interest in sex has been diminished, and the victim did open the door to that question. But earlier? The question of

Does providing a list of sexual partners past and present answer the questions raised in the most direct fashion? If she hasn’t been interested in sex, couldn’t she still engage in sex? What if she is so twisted around from the rape and the school’s response that she has meaningless sex that she does not enjoy/has no

Her past sexual history would not be admissible per Federal Evidence Rules 412-415. However, she can be required to disclose any sexual history she had with the perpetrator before the assault took place (e.g., if she consented to sex with him in the past). She can also be required to disclose any other sexual acts

You know when someone starts talking about how they have a high IQ and it has been tested, they’re going to say something really stupid after.

How is this not just mealy-mouthed speculation? ‘Might work’ with no supporting evidence, “not sure it’s the approach that makes the most sense” when evidence demonstrates a 98% satisfaction rate and a drastic decrease in suicide attempts, among other benefits (compared to doing nothing, which... solves nothing and

I try to limit my commentary on Jez and elsewhere to that which I feel lends insight or specific knowledge of particular issues. And yes, when I see people commenting on things in which they have no background or nothing special to add, I do consider them self-important blowhards. It's not a very exclusive group.

You know what it’s called when you “treat” the “psychological issue” of trans folks rather than actually use the recommended methods? Reparative therapy. Conversion therapy.

How can chemotherapy be medically necessary for one patient if another was fine after just surgery? The answer is that what is medically necessary for one person with an illness or disorder is not necessarily medically necessary for another. Some people with severe depression respond to CBT; some respond to Zoloft;

I never said that. I asked why your opinion was important on this issue, which remains unanswered, unless “because I’m a self-important blowhard” was actually your answer. Go ahead, though: find the quote where I said you weren't allowed to say anything. Spoiler, it doesn't exist, outside of your own head.

Yes clearly I’m in the process of deleting all your comments, you dolt.