Same here—I also appreciate the dialogue, as I often learn something from it.

You’ve got a point. It looks shady as hell. But as far as I can tell from a quick read, it doesn’t look illegal. And that is the crux of the problem.

It doesn’t. It is the left’s version of “them people”.

I work in finance, but not at a hedge fund. I understand municipal bonds, their tax free status and their relative debt seniority. I also understand Puerto Rico’s debt rating and its implications.

I don’t disagree with the rest of what you said.

I do my critical reading using the Economist, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, and occasionally the New York Times.

At work and unable to see the video so apologies if this is explained there.

Because Justin doesn’t know much about cars and needs to generate something?

The hedge fund crowd? Could you please explain?

“That doesn’t change the fact that it is your absolute RIGHT to disagree.”

“Whilst in countries not so concerned with the lifespan of their citizens, you can get, say, a Tata Nano for close to 1/4 that price ($3,400 to be precise).”

I have a nice car that I have been driving into Boston for work, but after the company moved to another Boston location, the new parking garage has spots closer together, increasing the chance of door dings.

Union workers have different agreed upon rules.

Most people consider amendments part of the Constitution. And while the Constitution wasn’t handed down from God, it has held up remarkably well.

“LOL. I saw that. Some sort of acronym (I hope).”

“Yeah thank god even though free speech wasn’t even included in the constitution!” 

No, I do not. Do you?

“What company has standing for the anthem as a company policy?” 

In NASCAR—quite possibly. It might even increase support. NFL—no way.

“Where is that in the collective bargaining agreement?”