That’s because you have exactly the same kind of asshats running the show and when things happen, they’re like “oh, shit, now what do we do??”

LOL. I used to think there had to be an end at some point to “but Clinton”. Apparently not.

We’ve gone full circle with the insane right wing. During the Bush 1 years, Fox News and AM radio would just parrot whatever came out of the Administration’s butthole. Now we have an administration parroting butthole excretions. Fucking amazing.

So your response is “investigate Clinton”?

Except that Clinton isn’t the POTUS. Priority has to go to the current sitting POTUS’s cabinet/staff over that of their defeated opponent. Unless you think Clinton is somehow running the country from her non-POTUS/non-government position. And if that’s the case, an investigation into how that is happening would be…

Your republican friends really feel comfortable discussing opposition that “doesn’t know what she is talking about”? Interesting.

Well, you and your Republican House friends can snicker at Maxine Waters all you want. But she was smart enough to have voted no on the Iraq invasion.

... and all those transcripts for the speeches she gave to Goldman Sachs, and Benghazi, you know.

I don’t think it’s headed where you think it is. The GOP is a different animal, now, and the independent press has a lot less credibility with their constituents. There will be a hearing for Flynn. GOP softballs will be hurled, a week will pass and the conclusion will be that there was nothing to see, here, move…

So you’re blaming Obama for not knowing the future? You don’t seem biased at all.

I absolutely think that Pence is involved as much as anyone. He may not be involved directly, but he likely knows about it and condones it. He would have to claim to be an oblivious idiot to not know what is going on.

The actions in question have been since he was forced out of the DIA so I don’t really see how the article is demonstrating bias.

I’m not sure pence gets out of the shitstorm clean and shiny. By the time the dust settles, it might be president Ryan.

I have to admit, when I saw President Trump’s tweet reaction this morning, I just kinda mocked it and didn’t think much of it. Then, it started to sink in. Look at this guy. It is the MEDIA’S fault. Not that he allowed a traitor in the White House. Not that there was a known serious security issue, that up until…

So President Obama refused to meet with the guy who we now know has been compromised by his relationship with the Russians, but “we” are biased? Perhaps President Obama had a very good reason for not meeting with Flynn? Maybe? We already know that he was compromised BEFORE this administration ever took shape.

Trump’s pick to replace him? Either Keith Kellogg, the guy who helped war criminal Paul Bremer destroy Iraq and David Petraus, who traded classified information for some ass.

Don’t tease me

was reading fox news today. The spin coming out of Flynn and the White House isn’t “man, this guy fucked up, glad we got rid of him”, it’s “we need an investigation into why all this illegal activity is getting leaked to the press!”.
It’s like he’s directly channeling the spirit of Richard Nixon.

There was a two year period between the first article by Woodward published by the Washington Post and the resignation of Nixon.

Good thing Flynn went over there in person and then lied in person to Pence instead of using email.