You still think insult is an argument.

You just have to keep trying to squeeze me into your binary worldview. How sad.

“you just believe what the corporations that dominate the markets tell you.”

Depends on exactly which post you replied to.

It is obvious you have no clue what you are looking at.

You’re babbling and not making sense.

Yes it was a TV show. In that episode expert scientists were interviewed. Some of them are still around today and have simply changed from cooling to warming. It’s a record of what your experts said forty+ years ago. As are countless newspaper articles.

Hard copies. The Foreign Affairs issue is stored quite some…

The problem with your claim is that there are no authorities or anyone else of political or economic power saying what I have put forth. You on the other hand are following the idea that intelligence is repeating back what authority says.

You’re missing the real purposes.

“i was saying that you’re stupid.”

Your ignorance is astounding. There were several doomsdays set in the 1970s from cooling, overpopulation, running out of oil, and much more. I was taught some of them in grade school. Despite all these prophetic predictions of doom from scientists in my lifetime nothing has actually happened. I’ve been following this…

Yes, I know you like to be ruled turtleface. Be told what to do, what to think, what to believe, how to live, and so on. Without edicts you might not be able to get out of bed in the morning for fear of needing to learn and think on your own.

Markets that are not interfered with are rather quite stable and when they do suffer shocks due some natural disaster or sudden input they recover more quickly. However control freaks and manipulators can’t keep from messing with markets leading to sudden crashes and long recoveries. But of course you can’t see it…

NM.

It’s easy to say that when you’ll be dead before things get bad, I guess.

Insult is not an argument

What the price fails to capture is negative externalities from the extraction, refining, shipping, and burning of oil. It probably should cost more than it does.

It very much does. When the price does not support extraction and manufacturing cost wells get capped and refineries are closed. Now due some regulatory…

“It’s “cheap” in America because of subsidies paid through *other* taxes on unrelated commodities.”

There is the profession of science and then there is actual science. I use the later. It’s good that you mention the IPCC. Look at IPCC reports going back to the first one (1990 or so). Here you can watch the process of how your experts change the story to meet political demands. You can also see their predictions and…

“Go look at a few villages in Alaska”