No they didn’t. They could have clipped the cop car.

Glad you agree it’s not something they had to do.

The _company_ you worked for, not the government. A company sure would have such a thing, the government on the other hand...

Don’t park cop cars in the path of the fire truck.

I’ve seen fire trucks driven such that they don’t hit legally parked cars.

Stealth has its own qualities. That original Taurus SHO could be driven in ways a 911 couldn’t be on public roads. If one didn’t want to see the inside of a traffic court that is.

Nobody goes around handling this sort of thing. Most likely the owner will return to his car with the bumper cover half torn off without so much as note. It’s like when cops bust in and tear apart the wrong house. They might say ‘oops our bad’ at most. The homeowner is then left to repair the damage and then fight for…

You’re missing the point. Namely the cops’ incompetence.

The car is parked legally, it’s the cops who are blocking the fire truck.

It’s just a car parked on the street, the fire most likely has no relationship to the car’s owner.

So he gets to pay higher premiums for years because of the cops and that’s just fair?

Shoving the police vehicles is one thing but tearing the bumper cover off someone’s legally parked car to get around them is another. That’s not right. 

Um... the first thing that crosses my mind isn’t some obscure murder case, but a standard from silent films on forward.

The US federal government has been murdering and indirectly causing the deaths of people around the world with its meddling in other people’s affairs for over a century and suddenly because Trump, you’re concerned now?

It’s quite a cognitive dissonance problem here for the modern left-collectivist. A woman’s safety, various tenants of feminism, typical bullying and shaming tactics, and homosexuals as a protected class are now placed within direct conflict with each other. The easiest way out of the logic trap is to dismiss her…

“Are all of you still mystified that the world is run by men?????”

“For this reason, her concern about whether an actor had shot gay porn makes little sense - they all have the same testing requirements.”

The only people who can’t see it from one of the “sides” are the people who think the political parties are “sides”. There are two parties that fight each other over plunder, if you can’t see that, it is you that is “high”. Want to be attacked by both “sides”? Aim to end the plundering. Watch both your “sides” attack…

Likely so, but then a full list of fees up front would be desirable if that were the primary aim.

“Right, if airlines weren’t regulated they would all be super honest and disclose all of their fees up front. LOL.”