Out of LDJ?
Out of LDJ?
The big deal is that with a Lytro sensor, that plane of focus can be changed later. You can capture the image, then the next day decide you want the guy in back in focus. The raw image contains all of the data to refocus the photo after the fact. I doubt you get that functionality out of your Android phone.
They'll still need to adhere to ICAO Code E/F design, mandating wingtip spacing from adjoining taxiways and such.
Terminals yes, runways nope.
Double the wingspan means airport redesign to accomodate the plane. The A380 already cost Heathrow about $775Mil in re-engineering and construction to handle its wingspan and weight.
I worked on a studio shoot a few months back for new Windows Mobile phones. I can assure you that they are indeed still shot as real images...then highly retouched and composited.
You're thinking of 100LL AvGas, which is indeed leaded and requires spark. This story is talking about Jet-A, which is a close cousin to both Diesel and Kerosene.
So insanely light its weight isn't listed!
Self reply with picture of it..
Meh...Panavision 300x.
"Nonpartisan"? All they did was leave off the NIKON label. It's not just a black and gold scheme...it's an exact copy of a Nikon 70-200mm/2.8 AF-S VR II. No specific affiliations eh?
Hate to make the argument, but I take issue with "It... takes some pretty neat looking pictures to boot".
"There's a built-in 3.5mm mic jack."
I've been using Statigr.am for months, which gives you a web interface where one can browse anyone's feed without having to "scroll, tediously, through your phone. They might tweet them, but there was no way to browse in bulk without slogging through the app."
Everyone was hoping the new 24-70/2.8 that was recently released would have IS, but sadly it doesn't. Canon did, however, just release a 24-70/4 that DOES have IS...but one sacrifices a stop on aperture for it.
I work as an aerial technician - a digital tech and a photo assistant specializing in aerial photography. I'm also based in NYC so I'm pretty familiar with the local routine here. I don't shoot much myself, but work for the photographers and fly with them. I've flown a few hundred hours with Vincent Laforet, and you…
Out of a helicopter, the "sharp" rate, with regard to motion blur is usually 1 out of 10 or so images when down at 1/15th (on a wide lens). When shooting a bit faster, 1/30-1/60, the sharp rate gets above 50% when on wide lenses. When faster than 1/250th, generally a gyro isn't used as it's heavy, bulky and limits…
Meanee, (same Meanee from PoA board?)
This shot cost likely 1/10th of what is spent on a full-page magazine ad for something most people don't care about. Pick one...Lipitor, Huggies, American Spirit Cigarettes, whatever. Most of those ads, from start to finish, are in the $50-$100k range when you factor in ad agency fees, production costs, talent fees,…
Canon's 24-70/2.8 is not an Image Stabilized lens, so there is no benefit of that. My guess is a gyro, which would be common practice for night aerials.