Oh you'll get a reason - it takes three or four compound-complex sentences to fully articulate, and usually includes the words "systemic" and "privilege"
Oh you'll get a reason - it takes three or four compound-complex sentences to fully articulate, and usually includes the words "systemic" and "privilege"
Are you sure you're responding to the right post. First off I agreed that there's nothing sexual about that picture. Second, I send "lounging around on beds together" which is different from "in bed together".
Good for the Smiths, then. My ex and I don't even let our daughter on social media, so I guess I have more "issues" than just that.
I give her partial credit.
Like I said, it's no big deal. Lots of innocent reasons for such a photo. And the picture seems to reflect innocence.
They have a charter that allows member nations to contribute military for "security forces" operating under the UN flag. This is how it should be done in these cases. Spread the responsibility/accountability/cost.
Required, no. Compelled, sure. But where do you draw the line. The world's full of atrocities. Should we base our intervene based upon "trending on twitter"?
lol if you don't get the impact of our massive military on our bottom line.
US needs to stop messing around in global affairs. The reason why we have such poor services in this country, is we blow all our money on being the global army of the universe.
I mean this picture is no big deal - just a couple of people.
There are zeld-ish games. Kameo for the 360 is very close (and highly underrated IMHO). And it has split screen coop.
That's cuz it was an empty room. Chuck Link, Zelda, and his little fairy, and Bob's yer uncle.
Fair enough - but imagine what kind of art direction they could employ if they had the horsepower to support it. They wouldn't have to go the semi-photorealistic route of this demo.
certainly not me - but my point was the first-date-guy-pays trope is still alive and well, even among otherwise forward-thinkers.
That's crazy, but understandable - they're living in the same effed up system as the rest of us. And the system leaves guys feeling like we have to at least offer and be ready to pay for the first date, if we want to maintain hope for a second date.
Can't argue with you - men are judged based on their earnings. But I still think, at the end of the day, most guys wouldn't mind making less than their wives, because that dated notion carries a lot less weight than mo' money.
I'm good being single.
these guys are presenting straw men. I know no actual men who would give two shits if their wife made more. And I'm not referring to just my "liberal" male buddies. I'm talking Average-ass Joes.
when my beloved guy Gus passed away in my arms a couple of years ago, all the vet did was give him fatal overdose of morphine. It looked like far and away best way to go. Complete relaxation, painlessness, unconsciousness, then death, all within seconds.