miik
Miik
miik

It’s a classic war of PC culture versus everyone else. Trump’s victory is a response to how overreaching, excessive, and annoying PC culture has become

How many anti Semitic jokes has Jerry Seinfeld left edited in to his Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee? Plenty.

How many articles have I read about those? None. Why?

Just like with most things recently, the people who shout the loudest are the ones who get the attention and spotlight. Unfortunately in this case, the people shouting the loudest are also the most misinformed. Which might actually be true in broader terms as well, come to think about it.

Being offended by something is nothing more than egotistical self preservation. Being offended is a choice.

it is political correctness, when poeple get offended by everything and then make a witch hunt on the person who dared to do something “inappropriate”...

You do know that Pewdiepie is very vocal about equality for people.

wow this is a long ass post about a fucking youtuber. chill out pussy

People really didn’t get the joke.

It’s not funny because Steve Bannon? The offensiveness of what a guy in Sweden does is determined by the electoral outcome of a country on the other side of the planet?

Then you have no idea what the fuck comedy is supposed to be about. The minute you start censoring comedy then you might as well just go live in North Korea. You may not find it funny, I did, and a LOT of other people did as well... and it is what it is. If you didn’t think it was funny, fine, but don’t fucking say

FOR GOD SAKE NO ONE TELL BETSY DEVOS!

Now playing

This pretty much sums it up. Complete lack of communication. Hilary never tried to explain her views to the other side, just attacked them for being “racist” or “sexist” for not outright agreeing. People don’t like being attacked. Attacking people isn’t going to raise them to your cause.

I could tell you why, but you aren’t going to like it. We lose because we champion our own freedom of speech while simultaneously shitting on other people’s freedom of movement, by blocking the roads. We encourage colleges to speak freely, while muzzling anyone we don’t agree with. We say that debate is critical to

So there was this groundbreaking Supreme Court case, it’s named National Socialist Party of America vs the Village of Skokie. You should check it out. But the TL;DR is that Neo-Nazis wanted to hold a rally in a town where 1 in 6 townfolk were Holocaust survivors. Obviously the town denied the request and the Neo-Nazis

There is a difference between “is it okay to shoot an actual Third Reich nazi” and “is it okay to punch someone you personally find to have abhorrent ideas”. We know what communist regimes lead to, yet it’s usually not accepted for some right winger to punch a Bernie supporter in the face because he considers them a

So since communists have caused more suffering, death and pain than Nazis, and calls for political and ideological cleansing, am I allowed to punch them?

It’s good to attack people that kill other people. In the case of that Nazi jackass getting punched earlier though, he wasn’t violent. Although he is a trash, piece of shit human being, we shouldn’t hit a guy who hadn’t (most probably) killed someone else. But, uh, go on with that one-sided regressive echo-chamber

Label anyone you disagree with a Nazi, ok to punch them.

Ah liberals. They call people fascists and then advocate violence towards people for just speaking.

I think you are confusing “pro-nazi” with “anti-violence”. Damn, these extremist liberals are pretty fucking scary.

It’s okay to shoot Nazi’s after you declare war on them. Not when they are law-abiding citizens.