You're giving her way too much credit. If anyone, you should be lauding Kris Jenner for Kim's success. She's the one that orchestrated Kim's entire career.

As someone who has recently had to start wearing them again with my wife, I can confirm that they are absolutely fine. Different, sure, but fine.

Right? Because absolutely none of the analogous things women have to do ever cause us the slightest discomfort or inconvenience. Hormonal BC? No side effects at all! Spermicide? Doesn't dissolve our lady parts one bit! Diaphragms? So comfortable you can't even feel them! Fertility awareness? Not an all-consuming…

It is interesting what you consider "small mistakes." Pretty much everything wrong about a paragraph =/ a picture labeled Amish instead of Mennonite.

2nd is the best. You get past present and future. What more do you want from a trilogy about time travel and sweet clothes?

The second one was the best of the trilogy. The third movie, although better than most movies, is the worst of the trilogy.

I fucking hate Friends and Ross but if this were a real life situation I'd side with the father, especially considering that the reason he won't be one of the primary caregivers is that his wife dumped him for someone else while she was pregnant. It's his kid, it should have his last name too.

Also a good option, I agree.

Fair enough, I guess. I'm not going to argue about something I don't have direct experience with. I will say, however, that if it's in terms of just pure comfort-level (as with sweating?? Not sure I want a full explanation of that) I think the point is what makes it more of a priority or a right for one man to be…

I take great glee in making those kinds of assholes move so I can sit—even if I'm getting off at the next stop.

I think he's saying the third child's mother is the one he did porn with. So he has two kids with wife #1 who know about the porn; a third child with wife #2 who was in porn with him; and a fourth child with wife #3. I did have to read that like three times before putting it together ;-).

Even assuming that's the reason for the false negative on the blood and urine tests, wouldn't the odds be astronomically low for a woman who is pregnant to experience a false negative through those kinds of tests AND to have no image or heartbeat of a fetus at the ultrasound? If we're talking about willfully…

Ultrasound tech here. I don't see any eyes or leg bones there, and I do fetal ultrasound all day every day, and I've seen lots of anencephalics and other neural tube defects as I specialize in high-risk OB. First picture is a uterus. I see a possible fibroid. Hard to tell for sure, but definitely NOT a gestational…

Honestly, looking at your ultrasounds, I don't see a fetus. Please hear me out. I think that the way you were treated sounds horrible. You're absolutely right that many doctors don't keep up with current medical research, so I am disturbed that several doctors brushed off your concerns about the Hook Effect. That…

I'm not saying you're crazy, Lord knows as a woman...Mother Nature can screw with us in more ways than I can count. BUT...not just one but almost a dozen separate doctors saying you're not pregnant? Maybe one pregnancy test coming out negative, but...multiple ones? Sweetie, you're not pregnant. You just...aren't. And…

I see your concern, but I have to agree with other commenters saying that this is in the clear. As far as journalistic ethics go, as long as Anna isn't reporting anything false or anything actively harmful to Ruby (and personally I thought Anna was very sympathetic to her). I think it was a fair article, informative…

I normally hate to question people's claims like this, but I find this extremely hard to believe. What "anti psychotics" were you told to take? What basis were you placed on hold? I've been around plenty of psych wards and not once have I seen a case where a rap victim was held on hold due to wanting to leave a…

Well, she was released, not on the psych hold now. So, does that mean that anyone who's ever been on a psych hold can't consent? That's nonsense.

There is no ethical dilemma here. She can consent to a story about her - she did consent. For God's sake, her representatives (John) SOUGHT OUT media attention. So really, it's just your misplaced outrage that is masquerading as an ethical dilemma. And I'm not even sure where your outrage is coming from. HIPPA? She…

Spoiler alert: She's not pregnant.