microgamer
MicroGamer
microgamer

Apex and a fresh new game for me called fatherhood.  So far, 2 months of playtime in and have only gotten puked on as a reward.

PC Gamer reporting ~50s loading times on an SSD.  It may have been addressed, but doesn’t sound fixed.

I think only the Mastiff and Kraber are relegated to supply drops.  

I know it won’t happen, but I’d love for the Steelers to keep AB under contract and let him sit on the bench.  It would bring me so much joy.

Give it a shot! I played a lot of PUBG, but that was mostly because my friends were playing it and I wanted to hang out with them. Apex is the only BR that’s actually got it’s hooks in me. It’s very fun, the rounds are usually 20-25 minutes, even for a win, and the abilities really do add to the game outside of just

Mirage’s ult is meh, but his Q is quite useful. I haven’t unlocked him yet, but I played a ton of Titanfall 2. People claiming anything is OP at this point haven’t learned how to counter it. If people were half as good with Pathfinder as some of the tutorial video makers, everyone would be crying about his grapple. 

People are asking for Caustic nerfs? Why? He’s only situational and his traps are easily destroyed. His ult is annoying, but it’s not game-breaking. Bangalore/Bloodhound combo is nasty, but on their own they aren’t anything crazy. So far, I think the game is pretty well balanced.

I dropped in the blue zone, picked up 2 Mozi’s and proceeded to wipe a squad with them.  I haven’t picked one up since cause I know I’ll never top that.

I don’t know a single person who likes the practice of exclusives. Some exclusives end up being great games, but the practice is cruddy, especially timed and third-party exclusives. Yes, Steam needs to change, but you’re mistaking exclusivity for competition. If Exodus was on both Epic and Steam it would be

Dale Hunter?  I was thinking more Marty McSorely.  Solid fight, still a human trashcan. 

Breakthrough is better than rush ever was.  

Whatever you’re smoking, send some my way. Crawford could be back in his Cup years prime and the garbage in front of him would still not be a playoff team. A team doesn’t get to -36 goal differential without everyone in front of the goalie sucking something fierce.

Not a bad idea, but if you’re playing each side once, how do you determine who wins the match if, say, the Allies win both times?  And that’s going to make for hour long games.

Agreed, but ultimately, with the rise of progression systems, more people would be angry that they aren’t able to use whatever weapon they want than making the factions unique.  

What? I’ve been playing since release and the Americans aren’t in the game. Even looking at the road map for their release schedule, they’re adding Americans in Russians in 2019. The question for me is quickly becoming, are you just reading the complaints and haven’t played the game at all?

Adding the M1 Garand would be another inaccuracy. Again, this weapon didn’t enter the war until the Americans did. People are being very picky regarding what they want to bitch about. The death screams are really the only thing that could validate a complaint. They’re so much louder than the males. Other than that,

No, people were quite outraged over women being on the front lines without the prosthetic. They still are. People are morons. There are weapons in BFV that didn’t exist in 1940 (when game is set) and both sides can use all weapons (brits can pick k98m, MP40, STG44, etc.), but no one seems to be whining about that

In no way is the community split. I’ve seen nothing but hate for it. The higher TTK is awful and the real problem, the TTD, is still the same issue. You still get one-framed because of network lag. You see one bullet, the enemy shooting you sees 5. Whatever data DICE is seeing about TTK being low causing people to

Microsoft PR, “Hey, a game blogger has become disabled, send him our new adaptive controller and foot pedal!”

I just went from 6 to midnight.