michaelwharton00
Donmiguelbe
michaelwharton00

So, how much does Wasserstein pay trolls like you?

Not this. ^^^

If it’s so conservative you ought to love it. Hillary is down with the DLC — which was the Dem attempt to pivot right and take away the center from the old, too leftist Democratic party. So make up your mind champ... Dude. I hope they are paying you good money to troll little old nobodies like me. I rail against HRC

Hahahaha! It’s sweet you think anyone needs to “cite allegations” about HRC. Like we have to prove anything about her... Her own party has to use Trump fear to bolster her case. She is one of the most mistrusted candidates in history. Hillary Rodham Clinton is also a loser as a matter of history. Eight years ago

Misogyny is real and shitty. So too are Republican attacks on HRC. Those two facts do not in any way absolve HRC from being critiqued on how she responded to women who said WJC in some way sexually harassed them. Why do victims of WJC have different value? Why are the rules different here?

Your response is very sweet, but I do not think you get the question: Did HRC castigate and vilify victims of WJC’s unwanted sexual attentions? Judging from your response, maybe I should add: Did WJC pay unwanted sexual attention to women? Or, is that all a result of Republican attacks? If said unwanted attention

Here is how it seems to work: If you or I disbelieve, trash or otherwise harasses a victim of rape or sexual harassment, we’d be horrible people. But when HRC does such things, she is a long-suffering wife and hero. Also? While we know that WJC paid at least one woman, Paula Jones, while her civil case was on appeal,

“She has put it away, idiot. She’s just letting Bernie run to the end, the same way Obama let her run until the end in 2008. It’s called manners. She has them. You should learn from her.”

This. ^^^

If she is so good at getting “shit” done, how come she such a fucking incompetent at putting away this election she was supposed to have won months ago? How come she can’t get more than a few hundred people out to see her speak? Where are the thousands of people lining up to hear her speak in New York? Where are

Football is deadly. How is still even a thing? What are we, Romans?

The only thing that makes this couple interesting is the unlikely fact that they achieved relative wealth. But since Michael Jackson and Prince both turn out, in the end, to be much less wealthy than imagined, I can imagine the same is true for these two. They are shiny things and we are kittens. We are encouraged to

So here is the thing that I think nobody realizes. One candidate can gather thousands of people at a moment’s notice. The other cannot. One candidate has won the last few conventions in a row. The other has not. One person continues to drive the direction of the discourse, the other one has to continually pivot to say

Either force people to do it at gunpoint, or shut the fuck up.

Yep. The thing to remember about certain groups is that your experience counts when it matches someone else’s political position. It’s like the Southern states, who are all against “regulation” until it comes to a woman’s right to choose. Lefty women seem all over respecting a woman’s point of view, unless and until

The right is not driving them. The Clintons themselves, with no push from the right, would be this way. Clinton hated black people in high school. Who works against a Civil Rights Act? They both say anything to win. So — no.

No. It shows Clinton’s distaste for that woman in particular and, from her treatment of the other black BLM representative, it’s an ongoing condition.