Because “listen to women” means “every woman should be unequivocally believed without qualification”?
Because “listen to women” means “every woman should be unequivocally believed without qualification”?
In all honesty what are we supposed to do when one 20+ year old allegation that can’t be substantially verified is used to discredit the likely nominee of the D primary?
the letter-writers worried that advising lifelong adult smokers against vaping would make them more likely to return to cigarettes, putting them at a much more certain risk when it comes to complications surrounding the virus.
Skipped the article and went straight to the comments for some reality.
I get it, there are not 15 peer reviewed studies that link vaping with being more likely to catch a severe case of coronavirus. But come the fuck on, that word “novel” that people sometimes put in front of the name is not referring to the coronavirus being a lengthy work of fiction.
If I could post on my phone I’d share a photo of a chest CT from last month. 19 year old vaper. Her lungs are TRASHED. It’s heartbreaking.
Um, guys.
I don’t think any presidential candidate should align themselves to “one project”.
Yes - as much as I want to see Abrams go on to great things, and as much as Left Twitter adores her, I think that nominating her as VP would likely be a mistake, when there are so many other more qualified candidates, including black female ones.
Thats not just lack of experience but also someone who doesn’t want to govenern in good faith.
I’ve been “independently studying foreign super models for 25 years” but I ain’t no super model.
Isn’t it interesting how so many “progressives” criticize Donald Trump for treating the Presidency like a reality show, when they treat their candidates the same way.
While I like Stacey’s educational and professional accomplishments, and I think she’d approach the role with the absolute best of intentions...her lack of practical experience in government beyond the state legislature level is a bit of a hurdle.
We’re talking about a part-time legislative body. GA’s session is less than 90 days per year. There’s nothing wrong with that; I’ve lived in states where the lady down the street or the prominent local professional serves in the capitol in addition to their day jobs.
Zero national or international experience and no getting around it.
Buttigieg is a perennial loser
In order- Mayor of a city of more than 100,000 is comparable to minority leader in a part time state legislature in which her caucus held little real power. Buttigieg lost a statewide race nearly a decade ago, Indiana’s also a deep red
I don’t hate the idea but I think there is a huge difference in preparing to govern and actually governing. Everything looks different from the inside.
I like Stacey Abrams, but she’s less experienced than Mayor Pete or Beto who were both mocked by many for presuming they were ready to be President, what makes Abrams any more qualified than they were?
Um no. Whoever is going to be Biden’s VP has to be ready to be president on any given day. I adore Abrams but she is woefully underqualified. Yes the optics will be great but we need substance too. And if we have too choose we should choose the substance in Amy Klobuchar. Luckily there are plenty more names being…