meowthrandir
Meowthrandir
meowthrandir

So someone with the opposite viewpoints politically of a traitor can’t also be a traitor?

Why are you promoting this trash? She’s a criminal - whose acts were explicitly harmful to our national security. The fact that in America she can even legally run for candidacy is absurd. And the fact that you’re promoting her? Add it to your trash pile of writing.

close all prisons and release inmates, make hospitals free, and open US borders completely

I sort of just lol’d at that platform. YES, LET’S JUST RELEASE LITERALLY EVERYONE IN PRISON. Is this for real?

There is a longer game being played. I would bet money that Russian bot/troll support of Manning on social media will be substantial. The more divided the Democratic party can be made (out to be), and the more extreme the divide between D and R — presumably one goal here is to drive Cardin further left, just as the Rs

Lol. Manning is running in a state that is home to:

130,000 Federal employees
11 military bases
The NSA headquarters

Like leaking classified military secrets to a front organization for Russian intelligence! Oh wait... that was her...

In an interview with the Guardian, Manning outlines her three main platform positions: close all prisons and release inmates, make hospitals free, and open US borders completely. She’s not messing around.

Candidates matter just as the Alabama GOP. I really don’t think Maryland which has a large military and former military population would look too kindly upon a Senatorial candidate that leaked classified secrets to a front organization for Russian intelligence.

Republicans are apparently clapping their hands over the idea of Manning potentially fracturing Democratic unity by forcing a confrontation between established members of the party and the identity politics of the radical left

she’ll be running against incumbent Ben Cardin, a centrist Democrat

Why is Jezebel obligated to have a “take” on every sexual assault story in the news. That’s how you get lazy articles that add nothing to the conversation.

Do you know who does stuff like this? Who ignores communication from their partner, going ahead with whatever they want to do sexually, while always making sure to stay on the legal side of things? PREDATORS. It is not the men who care deeply about making sure their partners want to be there and are comfortable but

Jezebel, What Are You Doing? Days of silence on the topic, and then what comes forth is not actually the thinkpiece on sexual coercion and the “ways consent can feel blurring”, on how predators purposefully use bullshit excuses about “miscommunication” to get away with it, about how Ansari is more representative of

Mr Humphrys should stick to entertaining-enough books abut the English language or religion and steer clear of political and social commentary.

 

So, OK, I’ve looked at all the referenced links, and I have yet to see anything official “signed onto.” I’m not discounting the idea that Durbin and the like will do the wrong thing, but you made it sound like they have agreed to the terms of a bill and it doesn’t seem that they have yet (please someone point me in

Durban did the right thing. Swallow the pride, voice one disapproval and get shit done. Put 600k people’s livelihood first, then worry about being right.

This is a bad deal, but I don’t know what alternative is better. I’m inclined to think Dem leadership is not fighting as hard as they should, falling into old convivial patterns and giving too much, but is there a better alternative? Stand strong on DACA and you get nothing, and while that may pay dividends in the