You wrote a thing strangers can read. Please provide us with your name, address, tax records and video of your latest physical, asap. You obviously owe it to us.

Wait, so my wish to be successful and anonymous is odd because my screen name is a bad pun based on the name of a celebrity?

For those who are disagreeing with this opinion, do you avoid celebrity gossip, which is built around ignoring the right to privacy?

I mean, she’s given interviews before that made it pretty clear that she was a woman, so I don’t think that “is Elena Ferrante really a man?” was a question that interested the guy who doxxed her.

Totally agree, I always say “if you don’t want guys to smack your ass at 9 AM, don’t become a waitress”

You acknowledge that yours is an “incredibly unpopular opinion,” but did you ever ask yourself why it is?

The future you’re helping to build by reenforcing this ethic is a fucking nightmare and I want no part of it.

1. Fuck you

Bullshit.

According to the article I read, they eventually removed the copy editor after her error rate went down. but then her error rate suddenly rose again. Weird, huh?

And yet they still employ her? She must have dirt on someone.

It’s almost incredible his company wasn’t bankrupt more than six times.

Your fear is justified. Hell, I’d call your scenario a near certain consequence.

My fear, as ever and as always with mandatory minimums in a white supremacist culture, is that the mere existence of them with respect to sexual assault will make it less likely for white rapists to even see the inside of a courtroom. That is: we’ll have to endure twice the amount of “their poor lives / futures”…

It’s only disgusting when women do it. Like going to the bathroom.

The mandatory minimum does not apply to statutory rape cases. And the adult in your hypothetical would only get a civil penalty anyway.

You mean not letting pedophiles serve their time on weekends? Rapists not getting only 6 months (which is actually only about half that)? You need a little more content here.

I agree with this. If someone is inserting something into you without consent (whether a penis or foreign object), I think it is fair to call it rape.

AB701 doesn’t actually change how a crime is charged, it just allows victims to call it rape. For example, inserting an object (other than a penis) into a body is still technically “sexual penetration with a foreign object.” But this law allows a victim to say “I was raped.” It’s a declarative law meant to support…

Until this week, the state of California.