Not sure about wimmen trolling in general, but if bologneseplease’s post was trolling, then it indeed was weak. As for how it can get over someone’s head - this is Jezebel and Poe’s Law is a thing.
Not sure about wimmen trolling in general, but if bologneseplease’s post was trolling, then it indeed was weak. As for how it can get over someone’s head - this is Jezebel and Poe’s Law is a thing.
No man’s land is gender neutral. How comes that “disrespects 51% of the world” but humankind does not? It also has that pesky “man” part.
Hello a non-shitty linguist with her thesis on language and its relationships to sexism, please do enlighten us non-linguists here how @Peter Larson’s claim that the usage of “man” in No Man’s Sky uses the older meaning of the word, i.e. one referring to mankind (as a side note, the person you were so agreeable with…
“If you mean “we can no longer use the word man in anything media related, even if we are referring to the male human or as part of an accepted gender-neutral term like mankind”...no. Arriving at that conclusion from my post would be a logical fallacy known as a (drum roll, please) Strawman.” you say?