While you’re right that modern OLEDs look better than anything else, there are no televisions, LCD or OLED, that meet REC.2020 standards. The highest is around 75%. Even studio monitors can’t fill the whole space.

Take your pick of definition: most of them amount to less than the chance of a child dying to a lightning strike. I’m not telling you that you shouldn’t be angry or even that you can’t argue for gun control based on what’s happening, but don’t claim that your fear is more justified than the fears you ascribe to gun…

Is it not paranoia to fear an incredibly rare death by a mass shooter? The person I responded to was arguing in bad faith that gun owners are cowardly racists who let children die because they fear phantoms, but besides instances of legitimate self-defense usage being much higher than the number of mass-shooting…

Supposing assailant(s) are stronger or more numerous than their victims, it doesn’t matter whether they have any weapons whatsoever. Since you teach a self-defense class you must understand that it takes a great deal more time and effort to be competent hand-to-hand than it does to use a firearm, although the latter…

CRTs still have some technical advantages, particularly the ability to display nonnative resolutions without looking like ass. I’m sure you know that CRT black levels and contrast ratios are only exceeded by OLEDs, but most LCD displays also have awful motion blur for a variety of reasons, the biggest being their…

Black-and-white CRTs have no scanlines, so their resolution is bound only by the precision of the electron gun and deflection yoke. I don’t know what kind of controller this one uses, but if it’s entirely analog and has a high enough slew rate it could possibly look very detailed.

Your attitude is disgusting and it’s the reason the gun lobby is as effective as it is in recruiting members. Reducing the desire to defend oneself to racism and delusion is absurd and requires conscious denial of every instance of effective legal use of a gun. If crime is so low that you don’t accept self-defense as…

Your argument is self-defeating; if your feeling unsafe enough is your criterion for justifying gun ownership then the obverse must also be true, which is that there isn’t enough danger from guns to warrant your attention. It does illustrate what I’ve noticed about nearly everyone arguing for gun bans, which is that…

I disagree with nearly everything Rand Paul believes but even the worst ophthalmologist is worlds above “mediocre.” This insult already made me gag but seeing it applied this way really proves the motivation behind its use.

While I can’t endorse someone smurfing in a game that already has a (quasi)non-sbmm mode, most of the people complaining about it are hypocrites. These are definitely the same people who, if they do something stupid and lose a match, reply with “it’s just a game!” and “it’s MY copy of the game, you can’t tell me what…

I’m a 30 year old med student who misses sleep 2 nights per week and I still go top 1% in every fps. I just want all the teens out there to know that these games belong to me and they should stick to falling off hoverboards.

How low must the level of waste be before you would acquiesce to actually fund services? 5%? 1%? Should the government have to pay you dividends back before it becomes a smart decision to pay your taxes for things like police? Is there some actual empiric amount above which you are certain the program is a net loss…