It doesn’t speak the truth. It pushes forward this agenda that somebody has less privilege than somebody else, therefore that privileged person is bad. Ignoring the fact that the less privileged person has more privilege than somebody else.

Thanks for explaining why the whole ‘privilege’ thing is utter bullshit to begin with.

Wait, so you’re saying that if somebody doesn’t buy and play the game 2-3 months after it’s released, their voice shouldn’t be heard? That has got to be the dumbest and most short-sighted approach to this problem I’ve seen yet.

Oddly, I didn’t have a problem with it. I went after the boss straight up and that prompted the arrival of the worm. The enemies mostly focused on it and ignored my party. Pretty easy cleanup. I might have gotten a good dose of luck on that fight.

Except the government doesn’t have any power here. They’re not the ones who would be firing anybody. So it’s moot. They’re just words coming out of some mouth of a dumbass. They hold no sway over EPSN unless EPSN chooses them to. Which would be on ESPN, not the government.

Except the government doesn’t have any power here. They’re not the ones who would be firing anybody. So it’s moot. Come talk to me when it goes beyond just worthless words.

But she has been warned before about inflammatory language.

The armor was a metaphor. It didn’t have to do with anything about actual armor. It was a metaphor for his game.

Except the government doesn’t have any power here. They’re not the ones who would be firing anybody. So it’s moot. If ESPN cows to them, then it’s on EPSN, not some dumbass in the government. Show me that the government is doing anything more than throwing out words, and I’ll agree with you.

Except the government doesn’t have any power here. They’re not the ones who would be firing anybody. So it’s moot.

Except the government doesn’t have any power here. They’re not the ones who would be firing anybody. So it’s moot.

Except the government doesn’t have any power here. They’re not the ones who would be firing anybody. So it’s moot.

I generally agree. He literally took 2 extra steps. Not like he went hunting for him on the sideline or something. It’s a split second difference between it being legal and illegal. You can’t charge him with some crime over something like that.

I agree with what she said. That doesn’t mean it was appropriate to say in any environment. Otherwise you create a slippery slope where it’s only acceptable if you’re of a certain political affiliation. Or race. Or religion. I despise Schilling. But if you’re gonna fire him, and not Hill, then we have a problem.

What do you define ‘actively and forcefully against’? Like where is the line in the sand that defines that? That seems like an important distinction.

No. I typed that, because it literally seems like that’s what other people are saying.

What are you talking about? She was literally suspended by ESPN in 2008 for inflammatory remarks. This isn’t her first rodeo.

Maybe we should just bring back segregation. Clearly white people don’t want to live with black people, and black people don’t want to live with white people. Does anybody want to live with transexuals? Maybe a neighborhood for those.

It’s time to move to East Providence. Or if you’re really white, Rumford.

Yes, and there are also people who use any excuse to shift blame instead of taking responsibility for their actions.