The owner played for a low level club in Italy as a teenager and has a nephew who plays for a fourth tier club now. He’s got Serie A, Bundesliga, EPL, and La Liga playing whenever there’s a match available to show.

A pizza place that splurges on a cable package that has beIn and serves pints? Sounds absolutely perfect!

Sarcasm must not translate well from English to other languages

Ray Hudson, I worry about him too.

Hindsight is 20/20; but what do we really expect by giving the flight crew almost unlimited authority over the passengers? Do we expect them to NOT abuse that authority?

You’ve got it all wrong. Sinbad played football with the Quantum Leap guy and Kathy Irleand’s boobs.

Honestly, I can totally see Marvel wading in with its zipper down to “show them how it’s done”. And succeeding.

I mean, in my eyes Powerless is a hard fail but that’s just warms me even more to the idea of Marvel coming in with their own 30 minute comedy and making it actually good.

The guy doing the facepalm in the background was ahead of the curve.

TRUE LEADERSHIP IS NOT LEADING FROM THE FRONT, BUT RATHER WALKING BEHIND EVERYONE AND THEN KNOCKING THEM OVER BECAUSE THEY’RE GOING TOO SLOW AND WHY DON’T YOU JUST MOVE OVER ON THE SIDEWALK YOU GODDAMN TOURIST I’M GOING TO BE LATE AND OH JESUS FUCKING CHRIST YOU WANT A SELFIE WITH THAT SILVER MAN ON THE STREET? WELL…

It’s a strictly moral distinction; by your definition, he’s legally innocent. by myname’s definition he’s morally not guilty (the implication being that he’s morally guilty). Both interpretations are accurate.

Well, I understand the reason they use “not guilty” instead of “innocent,” but it’s a political one. It makes people who disagree with the finding feel better about it and recognizes that the system can make mistakes. There is no procedural difference.

But in a court of law, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. So if you can’t prove guilt, he’s innocent. What is the difference?

Famous I absolutely disagree with. People love their fucking schadenfreude. The idea of publicly making a spectacle out of a celebrity gets everyone hard and/or wet.

If the semi driver was able to see you and had every option to stop or drive around you, then you and the semi driver share fault.

Yeah, that’s not what the video shows.

This has a little more complication to it, if you believe the plaintiffs. Their analogy would be that while you would have been dumb to walk out into the #4 lane, the truck would bear some fault for swerving from the #2 into the #3 lane to scare you, and mistakenly went all the way over to the #4 lane and mowed you…

I feel like the leading assumption now is that he’ll add the title “Queenslayer” to his resume. And given how things are going in King’s Landing that would probably be seen as a moniker of redemption by most.

It’s one week into the season, look at what he did last September, and the potential is off the charts. That’s why you stick with him.

Shonda does mention that in the interview. I kind of love and am kind of dismayed that no one I’ve watched that show with has ever caught that. It was brilliantly subtle.