@Mysta: Famous, how could that thing possibly be famous?

@chizelord: If concert photos are taken correctly, it makes sense to include them in your collection of images. Maybe he's just referring to pictures taken in complete darkness with cameras that are practically blind?

$650 for an oversized smartphone that may or may not have support for future versions of Android, currently running a version that isn't even meant for such a large device? Samsung, I already have a smartphone that can do everything just as well as your Tab, so it has nothing to offer me short of a larger screen. I'm…

The Rube Goldberg machine was excellent, don't get me wrong. I just find it strange how the occasion lacked any sort of emotion. He asks 'will you marry me?' in a conversational sort of way, repeating it as if to clarify. She just responded with 'Are you serious? Yes!'. My mind might be warped by the preconceptions…

It'd be pretty strange of a GPS company to entirely neglect the existence of a lake on the route, even if it is artificial.

First of all, what's up with the guy's teeth in the lead picture? They're kind of dracula-esque. Unless it's coated or covered in some sort of special protective cover, they also look quite dirty.

Not trying to be offensive at all here, but I could see this quickly becoming a trend for the portion of America that's less physically active than the rest. After all, why go down the stairs when stairs when you can get your ass to do all of the work for you? I mean, to be honest, climbing and descending the stairs…

@Kaiser-Machead v.2.2: You should have used a screenshot of the scene from the Jimmy Neutron movie when all of those theme park rides start blasting off into the sky in the coolest ways ever.

I was unaware that they used the paper rockets I made in tenth grade as references for their military weaponry. I don't know whether I should feel honored or ashamed.

You know, when I'm awfully bored and have no internet access, I get a real kick out of playing target practice with idiots like these that could give less of a damn regarding the consequences of their actions.

@apropos626: Ah, sorry. I thought I had detected a hint of troll in your comment, my mistake.

@apropos626: Are you seriously trying to assume that I'm a fan of the iPad? I'm not. By your reasoning, the Galaxy Tab is an oversized Galaxy S since it does have the phone function and the horrible two year contract. Oh and the display is three inches smaller.

@ConceptVBS: They haven't even announced the price of the wifi only model coming yet, so my statement is very much valid.

@darthVato: The iPad is an oversized iPhone. However, it has no contract, while the Galaxy Tab does.

It's interesting to note that every person above him on the list (#s 39-1) are CEOs, Directors, Co-Founders, or Presidents of major corporations.

@liftedngifted1: Some people want a shiny toy that can play games and slightly resembles a laptop without having to deal with the weight and 'complexity' of an actual laptop.

So, was the research done by the Geek Squad?

@Dylan Silva: The difference is that the iPad is fairly priced. For $629, you can get a 16GB model with 3G with no obligation to AT&T. Also keep in mind that this is a 10 inch screen, rather than the Galaxy Tab's 7". If they really need to subsidize hundreds of dollars from the price when the iPad doesn't, it doesn't…

@T-800: Do they necessarily have to make it so that you need to sign up for a two year contract in order to buy it at an acceptable price? I don't see the iPad coming with any obligations, so I really don't see the point in the Galaxy Tab doing the opposite.

Yeah, no. Sorry Samsung, but you can't try selling this device like you did with the Galaxy S phones. All we need is a tablet, not an oversized phone with a two year obligation. All most people want is a viable competitor to the iPad priced at the compelling $499 price point. Making it any more expensive than that…