Your first comment shows such a delusion that I can’t even read the rest of your comment.

The best way to show someone how little you care about their point is to continue to tell them that over and over again, and intentionally misunderstand it, I think.

If you think I’d be ‘bothered’ by people eating meat multiple times today, you’re exactly as stupid as I think you are. Or you just realize you don’t have any actual point to make.

“You have a reading comprehension of an 8 year old, man. This is a good insult and very original. Would you like a balm for this burn?” - gramercypolice

My position is simply that people who get self-righteous about the treatment of animals while they literally support the terrible treatment of animals are fucking stupid. I don’t care if people buy two hamburger and throw them in the trash. I’ve already eaten processed meat this morning.

I’ve given no indication that I think I’m the first person to make this obvious and correct point. It wouldn’t have to be made if so many confused people didn’t come running to these stories to act like they’re champions for abused animals. It’s laughable. I’m not obsessed about anything. I eat meat. I’m just not a…

Huh?

Good comment.

Strange response you got here. I was the one that was actually defending the trade by saying winning immediately was the goal, and that is what they did. I was simply saying it’s debatable, as it’s not clear they wouldn’t have won two years ago with Wiggins as opposed to Love, and once Lebron leaves, you’d much…

Of course they do, and they don’t like to think how it gets on their plate. It just makes the outrage impossible to take seriously. People don’t actually give a shit about animals suffering as long as they benefit from it.

You win the award for the most indignant person here. Well done. You can really tell how disgusted you are.

The fact that people like to not think about how the food gets on their plate doesn’t really change the fact that for 95% of people who eat factory farm meat, they’re simply valuing their own taste buds over the animal’s right to not suffer.

It’s debatable whether the Wiggins trade was the correct move or not in retrospect, but yes, winning immediately was the goal, and that is exactly what they did, it seems. The trade wasn’t crazy at the time, and still isn’t crazy, although it’s obvious that without LBJ, you’d rather have Wiggins there long term than…

Factory farms torture animals so we can eat them as cheaply as possible. I know fully well why they’re treated that way. I’m saying funding the torture of animals so you can eat them a bit more cheaply is only slightly better than paying to see a bullfight for entertainment.

Good response.

You’ll have to point out what part of the argument is fallacious.

I completely agree. People react very strongly to this point because accepting it means they have to admit something about themselves.

No, you literally don’t know what one is. The part you quoted above is not an example of one, and that’s true even if I was 100% completely wrong.

People can complain about whatever they want. They’re just hypocrites.

An idiot. You’re a very dumb person. I’ll allow other people reading this thread to decide if A) you proved me wrong, or B) you know what a straw man is.