Naive? I’m saying the criticism of Obama doesn’t make sense. There is nothing naive about that. If your criticism is of men who need to be reminded to think this way, then your criticism is of those men, not the man reminding them.

Except that logic you call strained clearly works. There are guys in this very thread admitting to it.

“It reduces the issue to something that only MEN can fix and women can just stand by until we unite all the dudes.”

That’s actually not main the point of the piece, and if it was, that would be so obvious as to be irrelevant.

This wasn’t the point of the piece, though.

Her piece isn’t about answering your question. It’s about feeling righteous.

“It shouldn’t take having a daughter to treat women—presumably a large portion of the people you’ve encountered your entire life—with the same decency and respect as you would a man.”

Some might. Some won’t. Some will depending on the circumstances. It's still the right move.

Forcing teams to go for it on 4th down more often would make the game more exciting, and could very well lead to an increase in scoring. FGs have become too easy as kickers have gotten better, and I do think it’s made the game less exciting.

Genuinely happy to hear they’re thinking about making a change, even if it’s not in the near-future. FGs have become too easy, I think, and it’s had a negative impact on the game. The idea that a team should get 3 points 90% of the time (or whatever the percentage is) for reaching the other team’s 30 yard line takes…

This is a very good and clever joke.

Holy Christ, stop, you’re literally the dumbest person on the Internet.

Then you’re a terrible and dumb person, as A) your calculus us immoral, and B) likely going to result in more innocent black people dead.

You’re an idiot. People make the ‘most cop deaths are suicide’ to show how stupid people sound when they say ‘yeah, but black people kill black people more often than cops do!!” in order to minimize the killing of black people at the hands of cops.

You seem dumber and dumber every time you make this point, as you don’t seem grasp the reason other (smarter) people make this same point.

If you’re serious, this might be the craziest comment in the history of the Internet.

So dumb.

1. I agree that was a ring chase.

I’m not that’s totally true, as Chuck is quoted many times defending his ringlessness by talking about his level of teammates, which is completely fair. I believe that many of them chase rings because so many fans use it as the measure of greatness. But even if that were true, then why was Lebron blasted by so many…

1. I don’t disagree. I’m not even really holding it against him. Just saying that we he saw as lame in 2010, many others still see as lame.