That number is highly disputed, as it’s based on reports that are proven to be false, but even granting it, are you saying you’d be comfortable with a 1/20 error rate when it comes to these sort of things?

Sympathy? Silence?

I didn’t say anything about Duke. I’m referring to the certitude expressed by so many people with such little info.

This is the strangest reply I could imagine.

Your response is all over the place.

I’m sorry, maybe you’re privy to evidence I’m not: what evidence here is ‘extremely’ suggestive that he raped her?

“He certainly could have raped her, and she certainly could have gone back to his bed after out of a combination of denial, fear, etc.”

Correct, and even in ‘discussing the news,’ people would be a wiser to show a little more humility in their moral certitude when they don’t have all the facts. Bro.

This response is literally meaningless.

“If you really want to stand your ground on the improbability of someone going back to their rapist’s room and sleeping with him, you also have to contend with the improbability that someone would be accused of rape without actually committing rape.”

Throw him in prison, I guess, right?

Correct, and in this case, there are two witnesses with contradicting stories.

“Does Yale have an inadequate process for making these determinations? If so, how?”

“Here’s how I know he was kicked out fairly: because he was kicked out.”- jezbanned

Also, I think I hurt your feelings which is why you used the sexist language of calling me a ‘whiny little bitch.’

“Here’s how I know he was kicked out fairly: because he was kicked out.”- jezbanned

Huh?

You’re dumb, dishonest, and boring.

No, read it again.

They are making an uninformed decision in determining his case is without merit, and that he should ‘sue himself.’