Actually Mao Zedong killed more people then the Japanese did, and there was evidence that communist regime killed more people then both Japan and Germany's World War 2:

You want to bet those are the same people that persecuted Arab and Muslim after 9/11 yet ignore Christian extremists like KKK, Lord Resistance Army or any other religion extremist. If 9/11 was done by christian extremists, then nobody would give a damn. Do you know the Tokyo Subway Sarin Gas:

I'm afraid it's true, witnesses who survived The Cultural Revolution and The Great Leap Forward said a lot of Chinese people died during those 2 events, according to historians, it might be said more Chinese died during those 2 events then the Rape of Nanjing. Also I'm Vietnamese Americans and trust me, Vietnam under…

Mao Zedong killed more Chinese then the Japanese. I'm afraid Mao's reign of terror supercede the Japanese massacre on Chinese. I hope you're not defending the Chinese regime on Tianammen Square massacre, the repression on Tibet, the persecution of Falun Gong, or the jailing of dissidents (like Ai Weiwei, Liu Jiaobao)

Sadly Mao Zedong killed more Chinese then what the Japanese did. Mao and Stalin were worser then Hitler and Japan during WW2. Actually I think communist regime were worser then Japan and Germany during WW2 (not defending their war action, it was unacceptable), but look at Tianammen Square of 1989 and the Chinese…

When the police raided his home, they found copies of Bomberman he had the original Bomberman, Bomberman 2, he was obssessed with Bomberman.

No it's not possible, we had proof that Hitler, Stalin, and Mao killed a lot of people because they played video games. It's true, look at this history book. Here's Mao playing Warcraft. and here is a picture of Joseph Stalin addicted to Command & Conquer: Red Alert on PC. Also (flipping to bunch of pages to find…

The people that answered are ignorant of anything outside of USA. I guess Eli Roth was right when he made Hostel he said that a small percentage of Americans have passport and majority don't go outside of USA.

I think this article may interest you:

I have an early model PS3 (80 GB limited edition MGS4 PS3), and when I read PS4 don't have any backward compatibility. I'm way concerned from hearing that news. I don't mind digital media, but I like game on disc better because it save up HDD space.

So will they complain if GTA5 get a Wii U port. If they don't, then I call hypocrisy.

"Microsoft published Mass Effect 1 in every region. That's why it took forever to come over to the PS3."

You should do it like this:

It'll come, remember Mass Effect 1 getting a PS3 port 5 years later. Yeah give Bayonetta 2 a year or 2 and we'll see it on PS3.

You have a PS3 and Wii U, well wouldn't you want Gears of War getting a PS3 port (or a Wii U port) for that matter if they ever announced it.

I apologize, but when I read your comment I take it as a hostile comment saying it'll never happen and yet people didn't learn a thing from the past when it comes to third party exclusive.

There's one more thing I want to add regarding Goldeneye. When Activision and Nintendo announced Goldeneye was getting released on Wii, Activision released a statement that the game would be exclusive to Wii:

Then why did it took 5 years for ME1 to get a PS3 port? When EA bought Bioware, a lot of you would assume ME1 would be ported to PS3 immediately it didn't. I suspect Microsoft funded ME1 from the beginning before EA bought Bioware. ME2 got ported to PS3 a year later because of EA, if MS had published ME2, PS3…

That could change, still I won't dismiss the idea of Gears getting a PS3 port just like how people dismiss the idea of Mass Effect 2 getting PS3 port before EA and Bioware announce it:

I think what Nintendo is doing to Bayonetta is just like Mass Effect 1 and maybe Gears of war, Nintendo is pulling a Microsoft. All those people that yell "Bayonetta 2 not getting a PS3/360 port" didn't learn a thing from Mass Effect 1 getting a PS3 port, nor other past timed exclusive like: