mdensch
mdensch
mdensch

No offense, but the buyer would almost certainly be best off buying out his lease and waiting until the inventory situation improves before replacing it. I’m also at the tail-end of a lease for a vehicle I don’t particularly love. I’m looking forward to driving something else, but I’m buying it out and waiting at

Vision only is a dead end, not a path to Level 4; the phantom braking is an example of why. My first guess, the Teslas on autopilot are stopping for shadows that they can’t disambiguate from objects. I’ll see this from time to time with my lane assist, where I’ll get departure warnings for the shadows of power lines.

“Elon Musk hates government regulation and yet his company keeps offering the best argument for it.”

It’s way overpriced, but...

So, which street in Bel-Air do you live on?

And, let’s be honest, those are much cooler!

Ford C-Max: For the guy who wants Dodge Caravan utility on a Kia Forte gas budget.

... or two NBs, one for the street and one for the track :)

We need to Grandpa Simpson up the comments with stories about onions and bees and such to make the comment sifting as painful as the slideshow.

I know it’s not a car, but honestly? The whole of FCA Stellantis.

It’s just simply not worth it. We see how it ended in this instance, and we’ve now seen multiple instances of people pulling guns. It’s just not worth it. It’s to the point where if I see two people aggressively driving and clearly antagonizing one another, I get as far away as I can for fear of gunfire erupting.

Really amazed at the “both-sides-ism” here.

People won’t like to hear it, but there are all kinds of industries that test mission critical software and hardware on the public (with health and wellness at stake). In all cases I know of, those trials are VERY well controlled though.

They actually believe this at Tesla because they argue that it is safer than manual driving. The flaw in this argument is: the data is lacking and if you scare people off a new tech, they won’t touch it for a very, very long time, as witnessed by the example in the article. Note that a New Yorker article described a

Point of comparison for a car that was considered thirsty 18 years ago. It’s honestly an embarrassment that Subaru can’t get this together. 

The Mustang GT has the same combined numbers.

I have a 2018 MX-5 Club w/ stick and if I take it easy I regularly get 42-46 mpg on my mixed commute-mostly interstate and 2 lane. If I drive it very enthusiastically for a whole tank I’ll get around 37 mpg. This is all when the weather if warm to hot. Drops off when it cools down, which is weird. Even if I drive the

Not much of a surprise to Subaru owners. They’ve always had terrible fuel economy relative to the competition. My STI gets in the high teens.

Interior contain parts from two cars, one black interior and one brown one.

Wow. It was the black/tan that had me scratching my head. Usually in that era, they went all in with one interior color.