You are talking to a boring Marvel superfan asshole. He’s only mad at Tarantino and Scorsese because he knows they are 100% right about his shitty baby brained movies.
You are talking to a boring Marvel superfan asshole. He’s only mad at Tarantino and Scorsese because he knows they are 100% right about his shitty baby brained movies.
Or he just doesn’t like the pervasive nature a handful of IPs have on the industry. It’s an opinion about movies dude. Why do you have to turn it into a personal judgement?
I feel like you snarky asshole commenters should do the same...
Shocking that the ‘if you don’t see my movie you’re a homophobic bigot who voted for Trump’ ad campaign isn’t working
REMEMBER, FOLKS, IF YOU DON’T BUY A PRIME SUBSCRIPTION AND MAKE JEFF BEZOS EVEN RICHER, YOU’RE RACIST, SEXIST, AND ANY OTHER -IST WE CAN THINK OF.
People will ask those pesky things called "questions."
Erm...
Sorta felt like they closed the chapter on Sidney’s story in Scream 4. It was the perfect cap to her story. She’s the original. She’s finally out, and then Scream 5 had her married with kids. Let Sidney be happy.
I believe the situation doesn’t look great on either side, but we live in an era where women can’t do no wrong, even if they did wrong.
and they’d be right.
THE HORROR
Sounds like a good time. Maybe AV Club and their audience needs to grow a thicker foreskin. And I look forward to the immature responses I’m going to get, just like the comment section on Facebook of trolls for attacking someone with an opinion that isn’t theirs. Too bad they aren’t as brave as in person...
You almost never know who the opening act is for a comedy show and sometimes you don’t like that act.
It’s HIS case, though. You started this thread by saying “it feels like a weird structure for a trial like this.” Why? Depp is suing Heard. He puts his case on first, in all of its ugliness. He is not “rebutting” anything. He’s presenting his case. He isn’t required to do so linearly. The fact that it’s hard for you…
She is the defendant. So she puts on her defense after the complainant makes his case. If she doesn’t know what his evidence will be, how can she preemptively rebut it? Just like in a criminal trial, you present your defense after the prosecution makes its case. You can always try to get a suit booted immediately…
A man gets attacked and all people can say is ‘Fuck Dave Chapelle’ Yes, the upstanding black and white moral folk of the AVclub comments strike again. I tell you if Hitler was trans youse guys probably would’ve let the holocaust go.
Man, I’m not looking forward to several months of *bloggers mourning Twitter and pretending it was good*.
can one ask these questions?
So if the question is asked, “What was the best comedy album of the year?” how do we want people to answer it, ideally?
He publicly owned up to it and apologized. He had a megadeal with FX taken away. Comedy clubs were refunding people if customers could not stand to see him and walk out. Millions in tour dates cancelled. A solid 3+ years laying low...and she’s against cancel culture, but wants him to still pay for what he did? All…