Agreeing with him just makes you look stupid too. The only point you’ve laid out is that there is no port of this on Switch (true) and that a similar game had never ever been made on weaker hardware and wouldn’t be possible on Switch (utter, relentlessly god damned horse shit). 1/2 ain’t bad though!

Or... Maybe they wouldn’t? Sure, whatever you say boss.

This opinion makes me physically ill. Honestly, potato graphics? Only potato here is the one between your ears.

Uh... What?

Alternatively, throwing around computer terms doesn’t make you seen any more enlightened. So congrats, it’s a stalemate. Fortunately, CoD is trash and will continue to be so until the heat death if the universe, so at least I’m saving $60. Bad games have existed in consoles with far less RAM. There’s nothing in this…

More importantly though, for those reading that aren’t similarly afflicted, you’re trying to equate a port NOT existing with a port CAN’T exist which is just... so stupid. Or you legitimately think I’m arguing that a port DOES exist when it clearly doesn’t which is... Worse? Yeah, worse.

My apologies. I’ll keep it short.

Holy shit you’re a moron.

A Nintendo obsessive who is, in this very topic, in love with games from a broad range of publishers who was SIMPLY STATING that I would be interested in this game if it we’re portable? Yep. I also occasionally make incoherent posts devoid of purpose, but I delete them instead of hitting the post button.

Its funny, because your post reads as if you’re trying to prove something but then the actual text is devoid of any actual evidence of anything.

Oh ok, so you don’t understand... literally anything we’re talking about. That also explains a lot.

So my opinion that I would really like a Switch version of a title in addition to other versions is “hell bent on being correct” and you, with no actual point other than “fanboy says what!” and regurgitated marketing hype about how much better entirely peer-to-peer gaming is on other platforms so an entire segment of…

I think what you were looking for was well reasoned and insightful instead of pointless drivel. Isn’t it a little hypocritical to respond to someone you think is being a dick by being a dick yourself?

“So you think that Nintendo, with their app based online, game specific voice chat opt-in”

I absolutely did, and it’s paid off in spades. Nintendo released nothing but AAA hits, I got Skyrim remastered, a phenomenal port of DOOM, Mario and Rabbids in addition to a bunch of amazing Indies. And in exchange, no one tried to ruin my gaming time until I gave them 2.99 to spin a slot machine!

Awesome. I’m sure you’ll be getting at least 400 games this year designed to trick you into spending money by purposefully hobble your experience with about 1.5 unique ideas between all of them. You know, just like last year!

I thought Wraith Fighter said everything you needed to say? I was actually looking forward to you not replying anymore.

Neat. I hope someone who cares about how hard life is for Activision having to copy and paste the game every year into a SLIGHTLY upgraded engine actually reads it. I’m not calling for a boycott of the game, just stating that if it’s not important enough to make a Switch version for people who would prefer to play…

“You honestly expect an underpowered system like the Switch to be able to handle a game like this?”

Excuse me, you forgot to include an intelligent thought with your posts. No, for all the reasons I described, I do not believe a console with an internet connection would be unable to host an entirely P2P game with less than 100 players. No matter who routes those P2P connections through their servers.