I thank you!

Fucking amazing. I wish NASA would divert some of it’s budget to deep sea exploration

I thought for sure someone’s computer had a stroke but whaddaya know. That’s really dude’s name.

It’s a solid 7.5 on the Matthew McConaughey driving a Lincoln Navigator scale of Manliness where the following is a 10:

Was their anything positive gained out of putting this woman on tv? Positive for America I mean. I’m sure Russia loved it. Also, if this woman had been asked these same questions in private without cameras in her face I wonder if her responses would have been the same. If they could check in on her surreptitiously…

I hope someone can do some investigative reporting on this and that she’s willing to be a good sport about it.

Oprah should just hire an actor to run for president. All the actor would have to do would be to mimic trump but be younger and more handsome. It wouldn’t matter if he were up front about what he was doing and that Oprah was paying him. He would eventually siphon off enough of Trump’s voters to ensure Trump would…

No way. I’m not buying this. Maybe it’s something like the fake crocodile dundee trailer where they make you think it’s one thing but it’s really just promoting something else. This country is way too litigious for a show like this to see the light of day at a company as wealthy as netflix is.

I didn’t watch the dunk contest. Had a bad feeling it was suck. I enjoyed the rest of the activities though. Skill competition is fun as a a race and there’s plenty of room to innovate there. 3 point competition had some duds but it’s worth it to see someone catch fire like Devin Booker did.

This is reasonable. At the same time, I’m wondering when will ESPN call someone’s bluff? Has there been an example of ESPN being willing to lose money on principle?

Not just labels I hope. Give me the equivalent of a black box warning that is displayed whenever the game loads. Also require it to be prominently displayed in the games description on any appstore or website where it is purchased.

Bravo

Can I have it? I’ve finally found the thing I would trade my left nut for.

It is one of the most beautiful things I’ve ever seen. I want to hug it and pet it and love it and squeeze it. I want to feed it chocolate. I want to make it my home.

So am I to understand that if there was improper contact than changing the rule was wrong. But if there was no improper contact than the rule is ok? How about we make this cap tv station ownership a law?

If so, regardless of their association to Cruz, shouldn’t they be treated as a terrorist organization?

I’m not going to read the court documents because I’m not interested in making space in my brain for their personal stuff. If it has come to this though, who the hell is advising Blake Griffin? If it’s true that he wasn’t giving her any financial support at all then what a goddamn shame. It’s deplorable. On top of…

What really boggles my mind about it is that you don’t even have to ask them about their past relationships. It’s all right there in public view. And their past relationships are with your industry peers. What is the appeal???

I suppose it is embarrassing from the GM and scouting perspective. It gives others ammunition to ridicule you or gives owners another reason to fire you. But to answer your question, it shouldn’t be. Most drafts are crap shoots outside of the top 3 picks. The real embarrassment should come from the implicit admission…

Hahaha! The self-editing overtaxed her processor and she had to buffer. Rough day at the job!