This makes zero sense.

Warren is not a true believer and refuses to admit that all of her plan for that plans will require higher taxes for everyone, not just the rich. Warren’s leftward sprint is recent.

What was their point?

What did they say that he could have possibly reacted to? Not unlike most of Splinter, those dudes were not interested in an actual conversation.

Many people have fought and died for capitalist democracies, yes.

I’m insisting that criticizing a plan to confiscate assault rifles isn’t a terrible plan just because handguns weren’t part of the answer to a question that had nothing to do with handguns. Please, try and keep up.

No, but criticizing his response to a question that wasn’t about hand guns because he didn’t mention hand guns in that answer is. It baffles my mind how this seems to be flying over your head.

Because not being asked a question is not a strawman.

Facts:

Where’s it say “hell yes” he’s taking handguns?

Still not a straw man.

My original analogy is apt:

This is a strawman:

That’s not what a strawman is.

Changing the constitution and passing the required laws would be way harder than the process of confiscating the guns.

How is an actually true statistic a straw man?

Per your logic, you haven’t committed any crimes until you do. So therefore it should be banned.

Why does it matter if it’s a weapon or not? This argument baffles me.

I’m sorry, are you living in a world where nobody is fighting for increased regulation of handguns? Tell me where that is.

So what if it’s designed to be a weapon or not? I really don’t see how that’s relevant if it’s a device or substance that needlessly slaughters many people.