Nothing says intellectual superiority like word games and copied links to the works of others.

So you’re cool with losing the last .2?

Poor egotistical Billy, lost in pointless wordgames and metrics, pathetically looking for a moment to insert his pedantry into someone else’s conversation, and sucking himself off in the mirror while missing the greater point:

...not the 150,000 or so this article is about, no?

What I said is of the people shot by rifles the percentage of fatalities is higher than those shot by handguns.

You’re definitely better at sanctimony and copy and pasting I’ll give you that much.

If you’re not cool with murders and want to save lives, you should go after handguns first. Very few people are killed by long guns / AR pattern rifles / etc.

Which studies?

So what? You bought something for fun that’s deadly. By your logic it should be banned, no?

Alcohol is involved in 40% of all crimes.

So? It fucks you up and makes you commit crimes.

Sure can.

Nope. Completely wrong. Ammunition from most modern rifles exceed 2,500 feet per second. Most handguns are around 1000 ft/s. Rifle rounds cause far more fatalities as a percentage; ie: mass shootings have higher fatality rates because gun nuts use rifles.

There’s only one thing to do: strike these companies straight to Mexico or China.

Oddly enough, if you care about jobs and businesses, I’d probably trust a billionaire demagogue over a lifelong government functionary who has never earned a cent that didn’t come from taxes.

You can absolutely make it worse by pretending your enemies will accept an outdated standard and acting accordingly.

The concept of war crimes has pretty much always been an outrageous farce, especially in the era of non-uniformed quasi-stateless combatants fighting from within the population. Even more absurd is the idea of the UN invading this war zone no one wants to touch in order to arrest the various Houthi officers and…

The era of lifelong manufacturing gigs as we knew it is over, unfortunately. 

Not according to Hamilton Nolan and others who hold a simplistic view of owners and labor.

Any member of the owner class is not “labor.”