That's kind of messed up.

I don't think there's anything I'm that oblivious about that I also use, and see hundreds of, every day.

No, that's just pathetic. I can't even imagine being that oblivious about anything.

Oh, I "get it." But arguing whether or not my comment was trenchant is pointless, since it just comes down to opinion. But what isn't up for debate is whether or not my comment was ironic. It's not, and you clearly aren't familiar with the proper definitions of the word. Don't feel TOO bad though; most people…

I'm going to take the lack of any substance whatsoever in your retort as an admission that you don't HAVE a counterargument.

They have a brilliant season, then half a dud, and suddenly people want to jump ship? Well then fuck off and do it.

The entire point of using Rick-rolling was that it was old. People hate stuff that's abused and played out, and they were trying to torture the trolls.

Trenchant: vigorous or incisive in expression or style.

You're not going to sit there and tell me that both candidates were equally lambasted, are you? Because they weren't. Not even close. But it's not like Clinton didn't have anything worth satirizing.

Why the hell do you censor "shit" but not "dipshit?"

This does a decent job showing the safety systems on a Glock:

Well, it's painfully clear that you didn't read the link. Why do you WANT to be ignorant?

I'm not, but maybe I should be.

Show me where that person referred to liberals as homos.

LOL, no I didn't, dummy (ad hominem!). I picked a very specific point you made by literally quoting it, instead of partaking in the twisted paraphrasing you love so much.

If the decrease in "run-of-the-mill" killings is greater than those of mass shootings, that's still a net positive.

It depends entirely on what you define as "moderate."

You need to read this: http://www.theatlantic.com/…

"You went with the knee-jerk "Liberals are homos" argument. "

So the fact that things aren't as good as they can be means that everything that's been done was wrong?