mattwheatley
mattwheatley
mattwheatley

As a psychologist, it's very hard to say it was written with disdain. The fact that none of us perceive the same situation in the same way as other people, or even ourselves under different conditions, is just a fact of our base physiology

Is that a real breed? The internet has made me suspicious and cynical but i fucking want it

¬¬ there's a special kind of hell for people like you.

Surely the two halves don't receive exactly the same amount of light. I mean, the near side faces us the whole time so gets darkened out by eclipses right?

His silence indicates he was taken away to be 're-educated'. He shall be mourned

Yeh, many people think there's no place for government in schools... Which is insanity of the finest kind

It's been done - about 50 times and I've only been contributing a year. We get edit's in our watchbox and people come down pretty hard on that =p. Theres a notice not to do it on the talk page.

Well played sir. You went subtle. I admire that

I know this, You Know this.. I bet Lauren knows this.

You could have bet your ass on a Soviet/West European conflict in some form.

Bah, directly to my retinas? My lens and fluid medium will be livid

Exactly - thats the point I was trying to make. I'm saying that they would have done - but the soviets had tested nukes by then. Nukes are a great weapon it seems if you're the only one who has them. I was trying to put that across but some people were arguing with me, not really knowing what they were arguing about

With infinite universes, aren't things such as having a butterfly give birth to a dragon not only 'likely' but 'certain' to happen an infinite amount of times? It's back to the hotel with infinite rooms analogy

Shush you.. with your.. 'facts'

And what conflicts were you involved in, in that time, which would have necessitated the use of a weapon to bring it to an end like that?

I want to reply but I have no idea what you're talking about

They were also years that were focused on the rebuilding Europe. The first conflict that had large enough casualties was the Korean war which started in 1950 and the Soviets had tested their first weapon in 1949. You're wrong.

No more have been used because other people had them. If it was a US exclusive technology they would have been dropped with impunity.

Not a crime, but they can deny you further service.

I sense a flaw with that design =p