mattrenntech
Renn916
mattrenntech

Automakers go back and forth trying to have the fastest car in a given category literally all the time, particularly in the past few decades. I honestly don’t see how this is any different than that, and I’ve literally never seen anyone complain about it before. At least not in the sense of basically saying it’s

Yet Audi themselves use the name quattro on their Haldex systems as well as on some other recent systems that do not use Torsen.

They certainly used to, but don’t they now use the term Quattro for non-Torsen systems too?

Always worth noting that Quattro and X-Drive are overarching marketing terms and aren’t actually specific AWD systems.

Thank you because I had no interest in watching the damn video and expected the journo to do the summary for us. Ufda.

Oh hello...

Up until this April, I owned a 2009 Nissan GTR. It obviously was not a daily driver and spent a good deal of time in my garage. I bought it used in 2011 and in that time only put about 25K total. After years of property tax, licence and insurance on the car, I was spending a pretty decent amount for a vehicle to sit

This is going to be too far down to get attention but I have to speak my piece.

I think the problem here is that you can’t actually market this thing to people who don’t know about cars. There’s no wool-pulling. It’s not like the Urus (I finally have an excuse to drive a Lambo!) or some heritage-laden tweedmobile (Careful with the Jag, darling).

Lots of car names became famous to normies for

Government red tape! It costs so much to certify a vehicle that cost must be paid for somehow.  

With a really heavy clutch, I get it. That’s a pain in the ass in traffic. And by traffic I’m assuming hellish SF Bay Area kind of traffic. Crawling traffic where it takes you literally 3 hours to go 6 miles.

You want funky design, unusual body, quick, reliable, “auto” trans, ~$15k and you have a short commute?

Speaking as someone who is and has been in the US Air Force for over 26 years, I never thought I’d see the day when a president would happily admit to sending military support based on the host country paying for our presence. Yeah, I know that all warfare is implicitly driven by money more than ideology, and many of

America’s military just became mercenaries under Trump. Pay cash and we will fight your battles 24/7, we have endless supply of young people.

Whoa whoa whoa! But the US can make money off of the Saudis! Who cares about some GIs when there is money to be made for the bomb makers and the politicians? I mean, the Big Wet President is VERY smart about these sorts of things, just like he did so well with his casinos and every other business he’s ever run.

Al the F150 Bros need the oil to push their big dick along the highways. They're too stupid to know where the hijackers came from til this day. Too much country music and Jesus talk overwhelms their puny brains.

The reason they are there is to be cannon fodder. If Iran kills American troops then Trump will try to become a wartime President by starting a war with Iran. Notice he supports Turkey and did not complain that they shot at American troops; they have a Trump hotel. 

OK, that makes sense for the standard C class, and it’s why the C300 is now a 2.0T.

It will still burble. And amazingly, it will sound exactly like the V8 C63.

No.  C63 needs to burble, end of story.