SJW is a derogatory term. It's basically saying DB college students who think there insane ideas should be law.

“I heard you say one dumb thing so I’m never going to listen to anything you ever have to say ever, because I’m smarter than you, because I don’t make sweeping generalizations.” ............

Let’s start with the fact that SJWs are those self-loathing white metropolitan progressive morons with liberal arts degree who swallow bait statements like “But Azealia Banks cannot be racist! Only white people can be racist!” in regard to Banks’ recent ban from Twitter (over calling Zayn Malik a “bitch nigga”) and…

But, did she make sure everyone only ate organic locally-sourced food at their lunch meetings? Because otherwise, what’s the point?

In fact, I’d say SJWs are defined by the fact that they don’t really give a crap about social justice or the people who don’t have it. They care about feeling good or important. People who really care about social justice help to promote it. They don’t just say they do. Every dollar donated to a worthy social justice…

So you’re just trolling? gotcha.

Also, this is an aside to my other statement, but those people who are SJWs or whatever, they are the ones who coined that term. I was working for a school district a decade ago who didn’t have history classes, they had “Social Justice” classes. I had no idea what it meant, until one of the extremely progressive…

It’s the same if some calls you any kind of “-ist” in an arguement. It’s designed to shut down discussion, just like statements “anytime someone uses SJW in a derogatory manor, you know right off the bat what kind of person they are and can ignore everything else they say”, it’s almost like it would be “a big flashing…

If you don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about, even though it’s so simple, maybe it’s you who is a stupid asshole.

Yeah, SJW is meant to be derogatory. You can care about actual social justice issues and not be a SJW.

Did you really compare warning someone about something that could kill them to warning someone about topics that could offend them? This is exactly what’s wrong with the anti gamer gate crowd.

It kind of assumes that everytime a developer moderates a forum post, that they were in the right. Which I think we can agree, isn’t always the case.

There are plenty of examples of developers censoring fair criticism in steam forums. That’s something that shouldn’t be allowed, yet this article endorse that

Or maybe you choose to take take that approach so you can avoid the argument...kinda convenient

“censored” (read: moderated, something every developer has the right to do—how are we still talking about this)“

Not really. Social Justice Warrior is meant to be an ironic insult and the term as a whole infers one has a mentality that argues for the sake of oneself and not about the actual issue. I don’t know whether or not the developer earned such an insult but the reviewer was using it in it’s correct definition given his…

Unfortunately it’s pretty standard for people to slap a label on folks they don’t like and then use it to mock them. That’s the nature of trying to have a reasonable discussion of anything approaching politics on the internet. Everybody’s looking for that one snarky comeback that totally shuts down their opponent and…

Well SJW is a Irony title just like PC Master Race. SJWs are fighting for Social Justice unless you are white and or male and or straight then you can go die in a hole for all they care.

There are occasionally times where it’s warranted.

So what you’re telling me is that the system is working?