There’s a deep seated problem with the entire Gawker network. Though, I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but Kotaku, The Escapist, Gamespot, and several other gaming blogs have instituted ethics policies since the advent of #Gamergate. Some to better effect than others, but little steps in the right direction. I haven’t…

Sometimes it’s nice to walk into a Starbucks, take up a table, and use the wifi for a while without buying anything. :)

I support #Gamergate, and I loved the movie. Also, MRA’s didn’t have a problem with it, red pillers did. Returnofkings.com is a red pill/anti-MRA site (note all of the alpha male bullshit )

10 year old mod for GTA3 and GTA:Vice City. Patricia is just the worst. Seriously, don’t ever take information from her, she can’t do anything right. Why she hasn’t been let go is beyond me.

Of course it’s Patricia. When not giving her friends glowing write ups, she’s screwing over mod makers by not actually using the power of literacy to her advantage. Is there anything she CAN do right?

I was with you right up until you suggested Patricia Hernandez as a viable replacement (as a if a replacement for AK is necessary in any way).

You should really try to stay away from the word "literally", it's a huge tip off for your bias.

He has a problem with the individuals that harass people, not GG. So, no. GG has the same problem with those people, and have been actively reporting them for 3 months now.

"Innocent until proven guilty". The benefit of doubt should always be on the accused until they are proven guilty. We don't start with "guilty" and then work backwards. If there's been a sea change, then it's a horrible idea.

It's definitely a possibility. But, it's not quite as cut and dry as it been made out to be. As I said, I'll withhold judgment until I see a police report.

Look closer.

I have a strong feeling that had I linked to a feminist blog, you wouldn't have batted an eye. But, I didn't say that she'd created phony police reports, I said that she'd played the victim to increase her income. The kickstarter itself was evidence of this. Look at what she made before that dumbass made that stupid…

Yeah, no argument here.

Here's some stuff about Anita:

"They did respond to it - they said they investigated and found no evidence that she had slept her way to positive reviews at kotaku."

This is her Modus Operandi, man. If it was just some random, I'd be more inclined to believe her at face value, but Anita has done this before.

I think that there's no point in conversation right now. It will be buried under name calling and defensiveness on both sides. So, we should let it cool before going back to actually attacking the actual issue so we don't get caught up in attacking each other.

Yes, she's in full on victim mode. I know that she claims to have called the police, but I haven't seen a police report. I've seen her claim to have contacted them, but no evidence to back that claim. So, I won't make a judgment call on that until I see it verified. But, I have seen her play the victim roll before to…

Does it go the other way, though. Were you completely silent on ZQ thing along with most of your site? What was your opinion when Max Temkin was accused of sexual assault and then ravaged with threats online? From what I've read of yours, silence. Complete silence. That's bias. Of course you'd be against online…

As I said in another post, I'm letting this one blow over for now. DocSeuss is correct, we can't talk about the actual issue if we disagree since Anita is in full on victim mode. The issue will be about the trolling, and not about the areas in which she falls short. But, I can appreciate that you don't like being…