And then you go and make a good point, Why do you have to be all complex and shit? ;)

I counter with, The Oatmeal is fucking awesome, this particular comic isn't his best, and you're just some guy on the internet whereas, Inman has some talent. That is my subjective viewpoint, just like yours. :)

Play on Steam, and not on Xbox or PS3, and you'll see it more often.

As I replied to another mention of this:

It was an unnecessary gesture; and sad that he probably had to do it based on recent historical evidence of the kind of bullshit that happens when someone makes some off-the-cuff comment and then doesn't immediately genuflect before the complainants. It's a sad state of affairs.

No, he's right. Just like Fat, Ugly, or Slutty are right. Both things happen. I've been witness to both as I'm sure most of the commenters have. Maybe you just stick to single player games and aren't aware of the overall situation, Stephen?

Rule 34. No Exceptions. :P

Not mentioned in the article:

Ruh- Roh!

That would imply that they were actually selling these images on their own. According to the article, they weren't.

You've got a salient point, but I doubt you'll get a worthwhile response. :)

I wonder if Brian got a cramp from stretching so far to make the link to gaming? ;)

We were testing these in the market last year. They're very cool, and were well received. Also, you get a little token at the bottom of the glass when you're done. :P

Or, you know, use the buttons that come with the shirt.

It really depends on the game. I haven't been doing QA for over 2 years, and each company goes about it differently. At the first company I worked for, I was brought in for a triple A title at first. There were 12 of us on the team. We were in the development of the game, and not just porting. So, we started out with…

Ivory, and white gold would make more sense.

I wrote over 5000 bugs during my tenure as QA, and I have to say that the only people who were let go were the ones that didn't write bugs. :)

You pay for shit, you get shit.

The entire job of QA is to break the game. And then to reproduce the steps that allowed you to break the game.

It's elementary, dear Watson. It all depends on the wording in the contract. GW may have left a loophole in there that would allow for it. Now get me a spot of tea. :P